Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer
 

This took place in October of 2000. Not exactly “news”.

Doesn't matter. Whatever it takes to get the liberals here at FR all fired up and agitated about all cops are JBT's and the need to surrender in the WOD

41 posted on 09/25/2012 9:35:44 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Responsibility2nd
Doesn't matter. Whatever it takes to get the liberals here at FR all fired up and agitated about all cops are JBT's and the need to surrender in the WOD.

There is, however, a huge Constitutional problem with the War on Drugs. The authority for its enforcement can only legitimately come from one of two places [which are, ironically, illegitimate] (a) the power to regulate substances, as the 18th amendment granted, which was repealed by the 21st Amendment [I believe there are cases decided based on precedents set during prohibition], and (b) the commerce clause. The commerce clause is actually very interesting because "the states" appears the list with the Indian nations and foreign nations; now to apply the level of control that they are demanding [from the States] within/upon foreign-nations is an act of war [consider enforcement of such edicts], therefore using it as the justification for the authority to control drugs is extraordinarily... suspect, to say the least.

79 posted on 09/25/2012 12:21:22 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson