[svcw]

Ok, so you choose to not read what CFA has said but what a newspaper says.
This statement of theirs explains who they are and who they fund.
Good grief, read what CFA is saying not what other people are saying they are saying.

[EDINVA]

aw, c’mon, you’ve been around long enough to know that certain FReepers take joy in the worst possibly interpretation of absolutely anything.

[Cyber Liberty]

I read the PDF, and it was vague. No mention of Focus on the Family. The Washington Times story is crystal clear. So what am I to believe, corporate PR-speak vague Press Release or newspaper report with named sources?

[nickcarraway]

Sounds like they aren’t denying that story, but they are, in a round about way, confirming it.

[INVAR]

I read both.

Apparently Chick-FIl-A has modified it’s support of those groups the homosexual agenda has targeted for the initial boycott, enough to satisfy Chicago government to change their opposition to the restaurant opening in Moreno’s ward.

If there is spin, it’s being spun by Moreno and Rahm’s boys in Chicago. And that is the narrative established. Chick-Fil-A better clarify this and set the record straight whether or not they will continue to fund those groups that prompted the original boycott to begin with.