Skip to comments.
NY Times reporter: Bush White House didn't listen to 9/11 warnings
CBS THIS MORNING ^
| 9-11-2012
Posted on 09/11/2012 6:47:36 AM PDT by ExxonPatrolUs
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Reily
TYPO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!We new watch'a ment.
41
posted on
09/11/2012 9:35:15 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: ExxonPatrolUs
So it doesn’t have anything to do with the obstacles placed between intelligence agencies and law enforcement during the Clinton administration, eh?
42
posted on
09/11/2012 9:36:12 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(AGAINST Obama in the General.)
To: JimRed
TYPO REDUX!
That’s non-MUSLIM, of course.
43
posted on
09/11/2012 9:38:03 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: ExxonPatrolUs
How about placing the blame where it belongs, MSM. You dropped the ball on holding flaming tool John Kerry accountable for his role in preventing increased security at airports, specifically Boston. Never a peep out of you. Just one of your memory holes on this.
We here have been over this as much as a psycho woman drives over a husband. Your charges against President Bush were BS then as they are now.
44
posted on
09/11/2012 9:54:01 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: JimRed
Some western minds do know the problem. In this case, the problem is Condi Rice. Her belief in the niceness of North Korea, and a belief that they would not tell a lie let them keep proliferating nuclear weapons to this day.
It's not like planes crashing into government buildings (via Kamekaze rather than jihadi) wasn't out there in the popular fiction. Clancy also had a plot line about attacking Wall Street. It takes a complete lack of imagination to not check popular fiction plot lines for possible threats when you believe we are in a state of war against terrorists.
Condi Rice could have been told directly about 9/11 plans by Bin Laden himself, and she would have thought it too fantastic to believe, and too inflammatory to bring to Bush. National Security Advisors are supposed to have a bit of paranoia about them. Condi can't seem to believe anything really bad about anybody.
45
posted on
09/11/2012 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
slowhandluke
(It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
To: Ditter
It was to stop co-ordination between foreign intelligence agencies and domestic intelligence agencies over the ChiCom Army (and other) cash that was infused into Clinton's ‘96 campaign.
46
posted on
09/11/2012 1:43:01 PM PDT
by
Roccus
To: slowhandluke
North Korea had nuclear weapons long before Rice became Secretary of State and probably even before Bush took office. It was Madeline Halfbright who was naive about North Korea. President Bush included North Korea in the “Axis of Evil”, a position that Rice surely agreed with.
With regards to 9/11, Bush chose Rice as his NSA in part because she was an recognized expert on terrorism. She gave speeches on the threat of Islamic terrorism and I believe Bush even made it a campaign issue in 2000. During her first few months on the job she wrote a plan to go after Al Qaeda which was on President Bush's desk on 9/10/01 for his review.
47
posted on
09/11/2012 1:44:04 PM PDT
by
Pres Raygun
(It's the economy stupid.)
To: Roccus
“It was to stop co-ordination between foreign intelligence agencies and domestic intelligence agencies over the ChiCom Army (and other) cash that was infused into Clinton’s 96 campaign. “
This is true. Clinton should have actually been tried for treason and espionage. The reason he jets around with that poop eating grin on his face is he knows he screwed us all and not only got away with it but became rich while doing it. Bill and Hillary’s net worth when they moved into the White House was $42,000.00. Now they’re both multi-millionaires, where did it come from?
48
posted on
09/12/2012 7:01:43 AM PDT
by
MtBaldy
(If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
To: Pres Raygun
Re-read my post. I mentioned
proliferation of nuclear weapons, which presupposes that N Korea had them to begin with.
Then, read Cheney's book. Towards the end he tells about Rice and the fumbling of the N Korea proliferation troubles. Lot's of people are considered experts, without actually being one. Rice is an academic, her real world track record isn't so great.
49
posted on
09/12/2012 3:07:07 PM PDT
by
slowhandluke
(It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson