To: RitaOK
And yet, no to Sarah Palin, at the GOP Convention? No, to Senator Jim DeMint, at the GOP Convention? No to Newt Gingrich, at the GOP Convention?
8 posted on
07/23/2012 10:08:51 PM PDT by
johnthebaptistmoore
(The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
"And yet, no to Sarah Palin, at the GOP Convention? No, to Senator Jim DeMint, at the GOP Convention? No to Newt Gingrich, at the GOP Convention?"
He didn't do this by himself!
Where are the loyal backers of DeMint, Newt, Sarah, etc??
Not A peep out of them.
CRICKETS
14 posted on
07/23/2012 10:18:04 PM PDT by
LADY J
(You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
If Romney and his team really think Paul’s going to bring more actual votes to his ticket than Palin...I’m shaking my head here.
27 posted on
07/23/2012 11:48:45 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
Sarah doesn’t have any delegates and hasn’t endorsed the nominee.
I’m not sure what you mean by ‘no’ to DeMint and Newt. I’m not aware of them asking for something and being told ‘no.’
36 posted on
07/24/2012 2:15:16 AM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: johnthebaptistmoore
No, really, if Mitt’s people are telling him that Sarah Palin would be a cancer on the campaign and Ron Paul wouldn’t, he needs to fire them. Not because they hate Sarah Palin, but because they’re idiots. And if he doesn’t see that, he’s an idiot.
38 posted on
07/24/2012 3:23:34 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson