Meets all of the qualifications.
So how are the Darwin Awards actually determined?
Nominees significantly improve the gene pool by eliminating themselves from the human race in an obviously stupid way. They are self-selected examples of the dangers inherent in a lack of common sense, and all human races, cultures, and socioeconomic groups are eligible to compete. Actual winners must meet the following criteria:
Reproduction
Out of the gene pool: dead or sterile.
Excellence
Astounding misapplication of judgment.
Self-Selection
Cause one's own demise.
Maturity
Capable of sound judgment.
Veracity
The event must be true.
I believe we have a winner.
There is a Darwin award winner (confirmed), that lost at Russian Roulette playing with a semi-auto handgun.
The only thing that could have boosted his score would have been trying to play with a semi-automatic.
The only thing that could have boosted his score would have been trying to play with a semi-automatic.