Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This may already have been beaten to death by Freepers....don't know...BUT I have a question.

How is lying about having medals any different than lying about colleges, certifications, being a Doctor, Lawyer, etc.....

A person's military service and record is often a key criteria used in hiring and association.....

I would certainly hire Audie Murphy over Bill Clinton.

I am confused. Comments?

1 posted on 06/28/2012 6:34:49 PM PDT by Lowell1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lowell1775

Barry’s Supremes peed all over veterans today. I guess they figured this would be buried after they sided with Communist Party USA on CommieCare.


2 posted on 06/28/2012 6:37:38 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

I wonder if it is legal to carry an FBI or State Police badge and use it to impress and win entrance into events and awards.


4 posted on 06/28/2012 6:46:37 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

So now outright fraud is protected speech.


5 posted on 06/28/2012 6:47:43 PM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (Mandrake gestures hypnotically)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775
If you look back through some older threads on the Stolen Valor Act, you'll find there were plenty of FReepers who saw this strictly as a First Amendment/Freedom of Speech issue. I argued against them on a number of threads being strongly pro-SVA, but the main thrust of their argument was that lying, in and of itself, is not a crime (and that much I agree with them). They argue that if it's done with the intent to fraudulently obtain something of monetary value, existing fraud laws already cover that, and I also agree with them in that regard as well.

My contention is that not all things of worth can be expressed in monetary terms, and military service, and the recognition thereof, is not only one such thing, but needs to be given special consideration based on its essential role in preserving our society. Falsely claiming such recognition undermines the recognition bestowed upon the legitimate medal awardees in much the same way the holder of a counterfeit $100 bill victimizes every holder of a legitimate $100 bill.

Above and beyond that, it is my contention that as military medals, skills badges, tabs, etc. presuppose an extensive orders process, falsely claiming such should fall in the same category as forging or falsifying any other offical government record.

7 posted on 06/28/2012 6:56:37 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

Bring back DITHF.


8 posted on 06/28/2012 7:01:00 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775
How is lying about having medals any different than lying about colleges, certifications, being a Doctor, Lawyer, etc.....

It's the same thing, and I don't see how the Freedom of Speech, which is the freedom to express your opinions, covers lying about military service.

9 posted on 06/28/2012 7:01:20 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (With choices like Palin, Cain, and Bachmann, what could go wrong? Now we know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

This law had to be overturned otherwise Obama might be subjected to fraud charges regarding his birth certificate. /s


11 posted on 06/28/2012 7:12:03 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

I am not trying to be ugly about this, but try reading the opinions - they are quick and easy reads. I read Allito dissent, interesting. There is an explaination on this. It is only about 50 pages.


12 posted on 06/28/2012 7:16:26 PM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

I think the best bet here is to scare the fakes. There are now websites that expose fakes, so why not put a “bounty”, as it were, on them? That is, let it be known that it is open season on ‘spanking’ such fakes.

Remember back when some federal court decided that it was “free speech” to desecrate our flag, and the response was to punch out the flag burners? A lot of LEOs basically wagged their finger at the puncher and said, “naughty, naughty!”, but did nothing.

Right now, organizations like VeriSEAL estimate the number of fakes to real US Navy SEALs is about 200:1.

So the odds are that when you see some middle aged, pot-bellied and flabby, pasty faced, patchouli smelling, pencil-necked geek hitting on women in bars claiming to to be a an “ex-SEAL with a Congressional Medal of Honor”, he is *lying*.

And nobody is going to get really upset if he is wearing a nose splint for a week or two.


14 posted on 06/28/2012 7:20:45 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

Just wait ‘til I show up in DC in a black robe and tell everybody I’m a Sooooopreme Court Justice!


21 posted on 06/28/2012 7:53:24 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lowell1775

Kerry must be doing the happy dance tonight.


23 posted on 06/28/2012 7:57:41 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson