Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BOOK REVIEW: GEORGE WASHINGTON’S MILITARY GENIUS
Human Events ^ | 6/12/2012 | Jarrett Stepman of review

Posted on 06/12/2012 7:10:47 PM PDT by Pharmboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Pharmboy

“Finally, when the British had been larger beaten and driven from the American colonies, Washington had perhaps his most difficult task of all in that he had to keep the American military from breaking apart and keeping them prepared for renewed British aggression. Perhaps more importantly, Washington had to prevent the military from violation the right of Congress to govern preserving the civilian control of the military. “

The “British had been larger beaten” eh?

“Washington had to prevent the military from violation the right of Congress” eh?


41 posted on 06/13/2012 4:30:29 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I definitely need to get this book.
42 posted on 06/13/2012 5:30:48 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch
McCullough's '1776' is a great read.

I'd also highly recommend James Flexner's 'Washington: The Indispensable Man'

It covers Washingtion's entire life.

43 posted on 06/13/2012 6:53:06 AM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Washington was a genius of a spymaster

I was going to mention that, so I'm glad you did.

PLUS, never underestimate the visual of riding a white horse! I'm serious. He was tall and cut a dashing figure on foot, or on horseback.

I went to Washington Jr. High, and his portrait (Gilbert) hung in the front hall and in every classroom. Did you know that his eyes could follow you down the hall? Kept all of us rambunctious kids in line.

44 posted on 06/13/2012 7:06:40 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Washington contemporaries thought he was a superb general. British officers were amazed that he was able to build fortifications to surround Boston overnight, his retreat from Long Island was described as “glorious” by British officers, and Frederick the Great sent a sword to Washington in admiration of what he pulled off crossing the Delaware and defeating the Hessians in Trenton and the British rear guard at Princeton. His march from NY to Yorktown must be compared to Churchill’s march down the Rhine leading to Bleinheim during the War of Spanish Succession.


45 posted on 06/13/2012 7:52:00 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
The Flexner book is terrific, and is a condensation of his earlier, 3-volume bio. But if you're REALLY serious, there's Freeman's seven volume bio.
46 posted on 06/13/2012 9:53:41 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Quote: “I see Washington and Lee being quite the opposite.”

It is the difference between an Eisenhower and Patton. But you do need both to achieve victory. You need the strategist who recognizes the need to address all aspects of war both on the battlefield and in the political arena. This is the person who sees the big picture and keeps his subordinates focused. But you also need the brilliant and daring field commanders to execute the plan and, where appropriate, adapt it to changing circumstances on the ground. As a nation, we have always been blessed from the start with having both components working in concert.


47 posted on 06/13/2012 11:14:07 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The Flexner book is terrific, and is a condensation of his earlier, 3-volume bio.

After I read 'The Indinspendable Man' I ran across volume one in a used book store, and I did read it cover to cover. It took him up till the French Indian War. It was well written, but more detail than necessary to really understand the man. I decided not to go for volumes two and three.

For most of us who aren't professional historians, Flexner captured the man in "Indispensable,' and did it very well.

48 posted on 06/13/2012 7:36:14 PM PDT by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
Yes...I agree: you can "get" him with one good bio, and Flexner's is excellent. I did not feel I "knew" him until I read the eighth bio of the man. I know it sounds a bit crazy, but I really feel like I know him...
49 posted on 06/13/2012 8:37:04 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson