Not at all.
Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation: . . . And the Articles of this confederation shall be inviolably observed by every State, and the union shall be perpetual; . . .
He asked for strengthening of the Confederation so that Congress could meet its Article III responsibilities.
Article III. The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.
/Jacquerie
And yes, I would have been one of those griping about both the AOC and the Constitution. ;)
I just haven't in my life seen much benefit to a central federal government. I have seen the downside to a centralized federal government.
In fact, I've stated here that I think it's outdated and needs to be eliminated. Especially when it works contrary to what the people need and want.
Governments by men tend to fail.
/johnny
/johnny
T’anks- as usual you say these things better than I could.
I’ve learned so much reading those things you have posted.
reading your stuff helped me with the Hillsdale College online Constitution 101 Course. I agree there is no evidence of any refutation of the Declaration—but I have been quite guilty of knee jerk reactions—my friends help me backup and regroup.