Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CaDan

The political leanings of the snopes couple is not an Ad Hominem argument. It is valid because it is part of the evidence demonstrating that snopes has a left leaning agenda and that agenda often colors what they publish as “facts”.

Now, if I were to say that either of them is ugly or smells bad or stutters and that makes their info suspect, that would indeed be Ad Hominem.

Noting their demonstrably leftish bent is not a “personal attack”. It is a relevant point.


56 posted on 06/06/2012 8:06:43 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s; CaDan

“Noting their demonstrably leftish bent is not a “personal attack”. It is a relevant point.”

Well said. They are leftist trash and we should always verify Snopes Poop...verify, verify, verify. Snopes Poop is too often leftist dogma without verifiable assertions.


58 posted on 06/06/2012 8:23:30 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson