Good presentation.
Allow me to play devil’s advocate, for my own education:
When you scan a document and import it into Adobe (as one might do to reduce file size), couldn’t Adobe use OCR character recognition to create the layers that Lord Monckton is talking about?
If you run OCR you should get a document that contains recognized characters and words that can then be searched.
The 2011 LFBC PDF when opened in Adobe Illustrator contains no searchable text, and there are no recognized fonts.
What you do get when you open the file is 9 or 10 layers that build up logically, perfectly separating out elements of the document such as:
1/ The Registrars stamp
2/ The date stamp
3/ The green security paper pattern
4/ The signatures
That's the short version, if you want the full version watch the cold case pose press conference:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8muZ1Pe9OAo&feature=related
Its 1hr 20mins of high quality video professionally presented. If you have slow broadband it won't be fun trying to view it.
When there is no ascii OCR table in the document why would ANYONE who knows ANYTHING about scanning and OCR even ask about this, much less use it as a reason for the layers.
The presence of a clipping mask is proof enough that this was no ordinary ‘scan’ at all. It was a digital creation. That is a proven, verified fact.
There are so many red flags that this ‘document’ was a big f you to the world. It had to be. It screams - catch me if you can. It is that bad.
I am referring to Arpaio’s teams analysis, not the one done by Lord Monckton.
You have to do a little logical thinking, if you are able. It's not hard, actually, if you honestly watched these videos.
In fact, it's one of the key points that Lord-M was making. How could a computer program on its own know enough about the document to isolate the Hawaiian Registrar's stamp area and assign it a single, dedicated layer?
Don't you understand his point? The evidence he presents clearly shows human interference in the construction of the document's content.