Isn't Butch Maddow his name?
Posted on 06/03/2012 5:05:21 PM PDT by Theoria
There was a study released years ago where 90% of gay men said they were molested as minors. That is the way they reproduce.
If she dressed, looked and sounded like a junior high school boy, that’s usually a good clue.
It’s the homosexuals’ expressions, not the features they are born with. This is just another attempt to prove the “born taht way” lie.
A lot of homosexual males act “girlier” than any girl I’ve ever seen. I’m not buying the claim that it’s “normal” or “natural.”
SaraJohnson posted that a huge percentage - studies vary, but it’s likely 80 to 90% - of homosexuals were molested when young. That includes young adolescents plied with alcohol and drugs, and “groomed”, by older homosexuals, as well as outright forcible rape and other sexual molesting of very young children.
Older (adult) homosexuals seek out vulnerable boys and often befriend them, gaining their trust, and then expose them to “gay” porn, become increasingly physically affectionate, and take advantage of the vulnerable boy’s trust. It’s so beyond despicable and disgusting, to ruin a child’s innocence. Many of these boys are fatherless, from broken homes, or have a poor relationship with their fathers. Look at Sandusky - his organization was “working with” (yeah..) troubled boys.
That’s exactly what they do. And once the boys experience homosexual sex, as well as the emotional imprinting, it is very hard to undo it. ESPECIALLY if they are then told “You are gay and cannot change, you are born that way”! If such boys when discovered to be victims, were given proper therapy, many would be able to escape the “gay” life.
The Hollywood perverts pick out the vulnerable kids and molest and rape them, thus turning them into perverts. The parents of the kids often let this happen or turn a blind eye so they can get $ from their childrens’ acting. Sick crap.
_________________
Did you ever wonder about Leo DiCaprio and Scorsese?
Now John Travolta was a surprise I must admit.
What’s bizarre about Liberace was that he was terrified he’d be “outed”. When that guy sued him for palimony or whatever, he was outraged that it might become public.
Actually I don’t because I never watch movies; I’ve never been a big movie goer but in the last oh, 25 years I’ve watched only a handful of movies. I did watch Titanic and thought DiCaprio was a nauseating waste of skin and didn’t see how any woman in the world could think him handsome or attractive. He appeared effeminate and made my skin crawl.
Scorsese/Hollywood built DiCaprio up as a hearthob even though he is less than ordinary in looks and talent. Scorsese has starred this effeminate boy in at least 4 or 5 of his block busters.
Makes you wonder.
Your taste in music sucks too.
I don’t think there is such a thing. I know plenty of gay people — a LOT — and while some of them are pretty obviously gay, I wouldn’t be able to tell that most of them are except that they have said so or I’ve seen them with their “partners” or circumstances caused it to be revealed. And it’s none of my business anyway.
Someone I know who has pretty accurate gaydar (referring to the facial features thing) calls them peanut heads..She says the shape of the forehead to eyes, is usually different than heteros..Weird.
But looking at Shep Smith, and Richard Simmons, I can see that peanut head shape.
There have been one or two books (or something - interviews? I know I pinged a couple of threads about this) lately by grown up childhood stars, telling of the depravity of pedopohila in Hollywood.
I decided years ago that I didn’t want to watch movies produced, written, directed and acted by sick weirdos and leftists. But I repeat myself....
Isn't Butch Maddow his name?
Don't care, NFW, Absolutely, NFW.
So did I get it right?
I believe gaydar, as with most intuitive skills, is necessarily based on exposure to the subject of conjecture. I live in Atlanta, a gay mecca, perhaps second only to SF, percentage-wise. Thus, I have met plenty of them. One or two, certainly not many, have become sorta friends.
But, believe me, my gaydar works with the precision of a satellite guided missile. I am rarely wrong because here, at least, they make little attempt to hide it. And, you can tell in other very subtle ways.
I don’t hate gays. I really think they were born that way. The statistical prevalence of homosexuality in all cultures is about the same: one to 3 %.
Research has shown (I have no link since I don’t truly care that much) that if your mom’s sister is a lesbian, chances are you or a sibling will be gay. Sounds like genetics to me.
Obviously, I despise the “in your face” promiscuity of some of these folks, and their demands to change the historical meaning of marriage.
I know many (most) of you disagree with the “born that way” approach, but why else would anyone engage in such disgusting behavior?
The bisexuals are the epitome of perverts.
Just my opinion.
Well, after I read my post, as posted, I realized that I misstated something: Pedophiles and those who engage in bestiality are the true perverts. I was just keeping the above comment within the realm of “legal” behavior between adults.
Yet gay men still hold a fantasy about seducing some straight guy. They continue to make movies about it.
Even with the sex target is straight, the gaydar “isn’t wrong”.
the ones who are molested in Hollywood may become gay. Or at least engage in some gay sex for pay. Just ask the Cories who were guests at Neverland Ranch with Michael Jackson.
The characteristic of voice is a distinct dialect, not a genetic trait.
They send “friendly” signals to those in the know.
Just as transvestites are screwed in the head, there is no genetic component to wear the clothes of the opposite sex. Clothing is determined by social custom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.