Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: moonshot925
I disagree. It was both a deterrent that just so happened to help put the Soviets on the road to fiscal ruin and a capable system that complemented the rest of our nuclear forces.

I believe that it truly was time to modernize our land based missiles, although I would have preferred they be on mobile launchers, but I think we agreed in a treaty not to field such capabilities, but I don't remember for sure.

11 posted on 05/27/2012 9:37:59 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Pox
There is a reason that over 65% of our strategic nuclear warheads are deployed on ballistic missile submarines. The boomers are mobile, survivable, ultra-quiet and carry an extremely destructive payload. The Trident D5 has the same accuracy that the MX had. 90 meters CEP. Land based missiles are in a FIXED position. Vulnerable to an enemy attack. There was a plan to put 50 MX ICBMs on mobile railway vehicles but it was canceled in 1992 due to the end of Cold War.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacekeeper_Rail_Garrison_Car#cite_note-8

12 posted on 05/27/2012 10:25:57 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson