Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rodeo-mamma

“Yeah right, that’s what going Rogue was about, Romney?”

No, the title was about, in part, former Romney staffers, now working for McCain’s campaign, their obvious attempts to discredit her, and her reaction to them. Their perfidy even extended beyond the 2008 Presidential season.

Meanwhile, Mitt himself kept his petticoats clean by using surrogates to sling the mud, and undermine the McCain/Palin campaign, just as he did throught the current primary season to the other Republican candidates. And Romneybots wonder why neither they, nor their man Mitt, are liked by Conservatives......

“....then Palin needs help, cause not only was she the backstabber...”

See my response above. Twist it all you want, but Romney and his campaign are slimey creatures and the backstabbing knives are theirs.

The rest of your post is just more of the same pure, unadulterated, BS.

Romney was, and still is, seriously upstaged by Sarah Palin as a charismatic political figure. He knows it, and has been at the forefront of a campaign to destroy her politically.....

Both Romneys, George and Mitt, had/have White House ambitions, something lacking in the Palin family history. He has not, and will not stop in his bid to realize that ambition..........Palin can, and has easily let that moment pass, So your logic does not follow.

It’s simply a case of Romney recognizing that Palin was a more sellable candidate than he, and using his considerable resources to make sure she was marginalized, and thereby eliminated as a potential opponet.

Easy enough to do...... the liberal left/MSM doesn’t like her either, and lent their support in that endeavor.

Besides, Romney, “We’re not returning to Reagan,” is not fond of conservative principals, or real Conservatives like Palin. So it was a two-fer for him.

If/when Romney wins the 2012 Presidention election it will be soley because of the citizens of these here United States choosing to take the WH away from Obama....nothing more or less....(ABO).... That Romney will be the recepiant of the national electorate’s desire to flush Obama, is the one and only reason he will be elected. Other than that he’d be a non-starter nationally.

Have you ever considered a position as a historical revisionist at an Liberal College/University? You should... You’re a natural talent! That said, let me add.... “You’re amazing!” /s


45 posted on 05/29/2012 9:44:43 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Forty-Niner

Nancy Reagan officially endorses Mitt Romney.

Nancy Reagan said that her late husband, Ronald Reagan, would have approved of a Romney presidency. “Ronnie would have liked Gov. Romney’s business background and his strong principles, and I have to say, I do, too,” Mrs. Reagan said in the statement. “I believe Mitt Romney has the experience and leadership skills that our country so desperately needs, and I look forward to seeing him elected president in November.”

Governor Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, visited Former First Lady Nancy Reagan at her Los Angeles home on Thursday. The Republican presidential candidate has been campaigning and raising money on the West Coast this week.


46 posted on 06/01/2012 7:50:12 AM PDT by rodeo-mamma (The ends don't justify the means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson