Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel

“I would say, though, that ‘pop’ simply means ‘popular’ - which means it could be anything. In truth, ‘pop’ means nothing musically”

Very true. For instance, one of the reasons they dubbed Michael Jackson the “king of pop,” aside from the fact that he was popular, is that he so mixed various styles—soul, r&b, funk, disco, rock—that it was impossible to tease them out and pin him down. I would argue, however, that at different times there are dominant styles. Therefore when you said “pop” in 1977 it more than anything else meant disco, and to say it today largely means hip-hop.

That’s not to say pop and hip-hop, or pop and disco, or pop and rocknroll, or pop and jazz, or pop and whatever will ever be synonymous.


86 posted on 05/18/2012 7:35:42 AM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

Elvis was the king of pop.

Listen to the originals/predecessors of many of Elvis’ better known recordings and you’ll realize all of the genres he incorporated (Al Jolson’s recording of Are You Lonesome Tonight may be eye opening).

The Beatles held one foot in pop as well and certainly their catalog became one of the last groups to create such a song list that was successfully covered and reinterpreted by so many other bands.


89 posted on 05/18/2012 11:11:32 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Barack Obama has cut and run from what he called "the right war".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson