[allmost]

I've read compelling arguments that refute the greenhouse effect altogether. Your numbers on CO₂ absorption are bullshit. I would go so far as to call them a lie. Linking me to anthropogenic greenhouse warming links does not help your case. I've shown you, with 2 bottles or cans, that something else is going on. Refute my eternal observation before I read your paid plant.

[palmer]

A bottle of soda water stuffed with CO2 has much more gas than the ocean has dissolved in it. I mainly linked to WattsUpWithThat which is the world's largest site for disputing man made global warming. They post articles on everything from refuting man made CO2 to refuting the greenhouse effect itself to refuting that the increase in CO2 causes increases in temperature.

Mainly though they refute the idea that small increases in average temperature that come from increases in CO2 are in any way harmful. Mostly the articles there show that warming is beneficial and point out that occurrences of drought and other alleged effects of global warming are natural phenomena. That's where I stand, I acknowledge the greenhouse effect and the manmade increase in CO2 but believe it is net beneficial to plants, animals and mankind.

[combat_boots]