Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker
It was clearly a shot at Palin, but the original post misses the point by saying it was nonsensical—it was a turnaround of a well-known Palin quip.

There was no shot at Palin. The setup was intended to make you expect a shot at Palin but then the target of the joke turned out to be Obama and the dog. He was poking fun at himself, not Palin. Now some things aren't funny and so it was a poor choice but there are plenty of things Obama does to get me irate, implying a joke about Palin was coming but then making it about himself isn't one of them.

On the other hand, maybe the point (as some contend) really was a slam that Sarah Palin isn't delicious, whatever that means. I don't think so. But whatever, I'm probably wrong (I am about most things, just ask my wife)

30 posted on 04/30/2012 6:17:14 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: All

According to Larry Sinclair, Obama would find “hockey dads”
quite tasty........


31 posted on 04/30/2012 6:21:11 AM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: pepsi_junkie

It’s both—a slam at Palin and a jab at himself meant to defang the dog issue, no pun intended.


48 posted on 04/30/2012 7:01:38 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson