Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IbJensen

Would Paul be better than Romney?


6 posted on 04/27/2012 4:45:16 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MulberryDraw

Sadly despite his idiocy in foreign policy.... yes... as much as it pains me to say that.


9 posted on 04/27/2012 4:52:03 AM PDT by SouthernBoyupNorth ("For my wings are made of Tungsten, my flesh of glass and steel..........")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MulberryDraw
Would Paul be better than Romney?

Absolutely. The only thing worse than Romney would be to have the evil, arrogant, ignoranus who is currently befouling the white house remain. The only problem is that it is doubtful that Paul could beat the annointed one.

15 posted on 04/27/2012 5:03:26 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MulberryDraw
Would Paul be better than Romney?

No! On my number one issue, national defense, I actually prefer 0bama over Paul.

I can't believe I just wrote that. I think Dr. Paul would make a wonderful Treasury Secretary. I would not let him anywhere near the Defense Department.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

34 posted on 04/27/2012 7:08:58 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: MulberryDraw

Sure, having someone who is at least a fiscal conservative would be better than someone who’s liberal on everything. Arguably the biggest, most immediate impending disaster for our country is the debt, so someone who’s going to be a hawk on that issue would be a good enough choice, even if they’re wrong on other issues. Paul’s fiscal austerity would be far preferable to Romney’s tax-and-spend socialism.


38 posted on 04/28/2012 9:06:21 AM PDT by JediJones (From the makers of Romney, Bloomberg/Schwarzenegger 2016. Because the GOP can never go too far left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson