To: Olog-hai
Unfortunately, between the given utilitarian ethics and the need to publish, too many scientists have forgotten that one of the hallmarks of science is reproducibility.
2 posted on
04/01/2012 11:15:50 AM PDT by
hocndoc
(WingRight.org: Have mustard seed & I'm not afraid to use it. 2 men inherited a Bush economy.)
To: hocndoc
Without reproducibility, it’s no longer science. It’s automatically fraudulent. And what’s disgusting is how people’s lives and hopes are being played with in this manner.
4 posted on
04/01/2012 11:20:16 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: hocndoc
so it’s less about science and more about grant-writing (obtaining free money)?
19 posted on
04/01/2012 12:10:17 PM PDT by
blueplum
To: hocndoc
There is no incentive to find out it was wrong.”
Now apply that to the “social science”.................
28 posted on
04/01/2012 4:16:58 PM PDT by
PeterPrinciple
(Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson