> It’s okay to slander Zimmerman, but not okay to slander Martin, then?
In Martin’s case it’s not slander.
The Twitter page, his tweets, the photos of him giving the single-digit salute, all of those are real.
The Left are upset because they can’t find a racist rant on any of Zimmerman’s accounts, nor can they find any shred of evidence that he was a racist.
The Left slanders indiscriminately with impunity.
The right tells the Truth about one of their “martyrs”, and they call it “slander”.
They really are a Bolshevik mob.
The allegations that Trayvon was a gangsta talking, drug using, womens’ jewelry burglar, who maybe fought a bus driver and was on suspension for drugs....
Is relevant to two issues:
1 Whether Zimmerman in observing Trayvon may have had a basis to suspect Trayvon of being up to no good. A pot smoking gangsta burglar tends to present differently than a choir boy honor student.
2 Whether it’s possible that Trayvon was the aggressor. Again, it’s more plausible that a guy who sells or uses drugs, is into the gangsta scene, and already was in trouble at school, would strike out at someone calling the police on him.
Not sure anyone has put together the school suspension with Trayvon being in an agitated, hyper sensitive mood. Duh, he already was in trouble and may have over reacted.