Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Battle lines set over 'Obama money'
Ventura County Star ^ | 3/24/2012 | O'Reilly

Posted on 03/24/2012 10:07:20 AM PDT by Signalman

Filmmaker Alexandra Pelosi, Nancy's daughter, has unleashed a firestorm of social controversy by interviewing some welfare recipients who told her on camera that they believe they're entitled to "Obama money."

That is, welfare checks. A number of those that Ms. Pelosi spotlighted are young men who are not even looking for work. They have plenty of excuses for that.

But, bottom line, they want money handed to them and stuff you if you don't like it. Also, some of these men have multiple children by multiple "baby mamas."

Again, their posture is "blank you" if you don't approve.

That attitude appalls many hardworking folks, but truthfully, there have always been layabouts and there always will be layabouts.

But now, in some circles, it's almost stylish to be a parasite.

Recently, Mitt Romney was confronted by a heckler in Illinois who said, "What about pursuit of happiness? You know what would make me happy? Free birth control!"

Whereupon Romney shot back, "If you're looking for free stuff ... vote for the other guy. That's what he's about, OK? That's not what I'm about."

And therein lies the theme of the 2012 presidential campaign.

This has not been a good week for President Obama. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has projected that Obamacare will cost about $50 billion more than last year's projection. In addition, the president's budget for 2013 will add another $9.6 trillion in debt over a 10-year period. Not exactly the austerity spending the nation desperately needs.

But Mr. Obama is unswayed. He is running as a "provider" and believes that there are enough Americans who want free stuff to catapult him to victory in November.

Of course, the president is not going to openly endorse the nanny state. Instead, he will demand that the rich pay "their fair share" and hope voters buy into the insinuation that they are getting screwed by the economic system; therefore, it is perfectly permissible to want payback in the form of government entitlements.

That's just making things "right. The labor unions are pounding that drum very hard.

Speaking on public broadcasting, SEIU board member Stephen Lerner said, "I think there's never been a more exciting time ... to really talk about redistributing wealth and power."

Again, the theme is that America is an unjust society that needs a socialistic overhaul and now is the time to make that happen.

And Lerner may be on to something.

Presently, we are a nation adrift. We are deeply divided on fundamentals: Capitalism, the power of the federal government, the rights of the have-nots. These are the things the upcoming election will address.

It really is all about "Obama money," which is really our money. How much should be spent, and where should it go?

The battle lines are drawn. At stake: The future of the USA.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bor; obamamoney; oreilly

1 posted on 03/24/2012 10:07:25 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Finally O’Reilly is waking up to what Glenn Beck figured out more than a year ago.


2 posted on 03/24/2012 10:15:02 AM PDT by tell me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
But, bottom line, they want money handed to them and stuff you if you don't like it. Also, some of these men have multiple children by multiple "baby mamas."

This is what I call "voter farming". You tend your voter farm by providing them with free stuff and they grow up to vote for socialism.

3 posted on 03/24/2012 10:15:36 AM PDT by oldbrowser (They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Like a stopped clock, Ted Baxter gets one right.


4 posted on 03/24/2012 10:16:53 AM PDT by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

BHOTrill


5 posted on 03/24/2012 10:18:00 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser

[This is what I call “voter farming”.]

Bingo! I deduced long ago that the true purpose of the “Great Society” welfare programs was to institutionalize a permanent dependency class that would reliably vote dhimmicrat. They aren’t required to work and are rewarded with ever-increasing amounts of “owebama money” for popping out more future dhimmicrat voters. They live in gubbmint-provided Section 8 housing which will accomplish bringing criminal activity into formerly peaceful working-class neighborhoods.

When the owebama money stops there will be war. These welfare zombie feral pavement apes will riot and burn everything in sight to get the “free stuff” they are “entitled” to.


6 posted on 03/24/2012 10:30:32 AM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Fiscal conservative and social liberal.

Pray for America


7 posted on 03/24/2012 10:55:11 AM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Like a stopped clock, Ted Baxter gets one right.

Annoying though he may be, he is right (in MY opinion) better than half the time. In a batter's box or on the hardwood, that's star quality.

8 posted on 03/24/2012 11:09:19 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson