[nhwingut]

IN the micro, it was a dud. But when it is examined in the macro, it is huge. And I think that’s where Breitbart was going.

It builds on the narrative that Obama is nothing but an anti American radical - who was given a pass by the media.

His apologists look absolutely foolish now when they cry “guilt by association” - because the list is ever growing (Derrick Bell, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Father Pfleger, Van Jones, Frank Marshall Davis, Raila Odinga, Louis Farrakhan, Alice Palmer, etc)

[Signalman]

IN the micro, it was a dud. But when it is examined in the macro, it is huge. And I think that’s where Breitbart was going.

It builds on the narrative that Obama is nothing but an anti American radical - who was given a pass by the media.

Good analysis. I hope that the sheeple out there in the hinterlands will absorb and compute all this information and come to an intelligent conclusion about who Obama really is.

[opentalk]

Obama is a marketed brand. The MSM puts out propaganda and repeats is over and over across many outlets to make it stick.....example: he is a good family man and father. Yet that doesn't jive with the amount of time he spends golfing.

They say the opposite of what he is..transparent, job creator blah,blah.

People buy on emotion, these tapes are a hit to the brand marketing, especially if more of the same is coming. He cannot win if he is losing in the media.