Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Renfield

It’s beginning to look as though they were superior to humans, until they were interbred out of existence.

They certainly had a larger volume brain case.


6 posted on 03/02/2012 8:10:06 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin; blam

Who says we are extinct? My redheaded kids are not extinct.

Sort of conservative, tho. Not sure that they believe in fire.


8 posted on 03/02/2012 8:15:06 AM PST by patton (bad math joke omitted - this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin; SunkenCiv; Renfield; count-your-change; WayneS
Until very lately if somebody had ever asked me what Neanderthals looked like I'd have pointed them to Jay Matternes' reconstructions, but all of that has changed lately.

This is what Neanderthals actually looked like:


Image courtesy of www.themandus.org

Vendramini's website

I would say that some of our thinking on the subject of Neanderthals needs to change.....

10 posted on 03/02/2012 8:20:46 AM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“It’s beginning to look as though they were superior to humans, until they were interbred out of existence.”

They did not specialize. Their women were almost as large as their men and (from the injuries) participated in hunting.

As a result, they had lower birth rates and lower survivability of children.


17 posted on 03/02/2012 8:50:09 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson