[bike800]

In the barnes case...his spouse could be injured...and police have a right to make sure that all parties are safe...if they just leave cuz barnes says so...and someone really is hurt....then they get sued for negligence......u watch how this unfolds

[deoetdoctrinae]

COULD YOU FIRE OFF A DONATION TO FREE REPUBLIC?


Click the Pic

Donate monthly and end FReepathons!
Sponsors will donate $10 For each new monthly sign-up

[OneWingedShark]

In the barnes case...his spouse could be injured...and police have a right to make sure that all parties are safe...

No, they do not. The Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that the police have no affirmative obligation to ensure the safety of a private citizen.
See: DeShaney v. Winnebago City and Castle Rock v. Gonzales

if they just leave cuz barnes says so...and someone really is hurt....then they get sued for negligence......u watch how this unfolds

The DeShaney case invalidates that asertation.

[muawiyah]

Barnes wife asked the police to come to her residence to protect her against her husband WHO WAS MOVING OUT!

The Indiana Supreme Court ruled as if the husband had the right to beat her to death with the cops just standing aside. Some took the ruling to mean that the husband was in his rights to resist the police coming in at her request.

It was pretty much a practical test of Sharia Law versus American Common Law. The questions were pretty basic ~ (1) Do women have rights to resist their husbands beatings, (2) Do women have the right to call the cops for help, (3) Can the cops help protect the woman from her husband, (4) Can the husband shoot the cops or his wife, (5) ..... etc

There's lots of good stuff in this.

We had the Pro-Sharia Law faction on FR trying to hide behind the 4th Amendment!