Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2012 10:27:38 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv; blam

GGG ping.


2 posted on 01/03/2012 10:29:06 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Interesting that even people who may not read or write understand that there is something way beyond themselves to which they are irrevocably tied, and feel the overwhelming need to build something marvelous to the glory of that Being.


3 posted on 01/03/2012 10:40:34 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SirKit

Ancient Civ ping!


4 posted on 01/03/2012 10:44:01 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Reminds me of the excavation for the moon monolith in “2001”.


5 posted on 01/03/2012 10:47:17 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I have a dumb question: What is the evidence that this structure, or in fact many of the old structures are temples or religious sites? I always see that the people studying them argue for religiosity, but when I see a pile of rocks, I don’t necessarily think that it must be religious. I never here an explanation as to why exactly it is considered religious...If anyone can enlighten me, I am willing...


7 posted on 01/03/2012 11:02:04 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota (Which are you? A producer, a looter, or a moocher of wealth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
...Göbekli Tepe was built much earlier [than Stonehenge]...

....dig deeper and you will find stuff that humans have made...

...human nature is such that no matter how ancient, people like to dig and build things....always have, always will.

I am always surprised when people are "surprised" at what they find when they dig deeper...

...a good spot to build something now was a good spot before, and probably was since a great upheaval in earth's geography...

..I would speculate that the date of the "cradle of civilization" will be extended farther back in time as the people who study such things dig ever deeper.

8 posted on 01/03/2012 11:05:15 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Elections have consequences....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Great article.

The delusional childish utopian theorizing of Marxism drove the framing ideas of pre-civilized wild man the hunter-gatherer changing into civilized man with the advent of farming and the urbanity that farming brought. All hogwash! Balderdash.


9 posted on 01/03/2012 11:12:13 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I looked through the linked article and a couple of the sub-links as well and can find nothing which states what evidence was used to arrive at the 11,600 BC dating. I would not necessarily dispute the date since I happen to believe that there were very likely human civilizations which predated and were destroyed / covered up by the last major ice age. But it would be nice if they mentioned what organic materials have been found in association with the site and depth that could have been used to determine the age of these particular monolithic constructions. Rocks in and of themselves tell nothing about when they were carved.


13 posted on 01/03/2012 11:28:30 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Rock concert.


14 posted on 01/03/2012 11:31:13 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I’m just an ignorant non-intellectual, but after reading the Nat.G. article and viewing the pix, my opinion is that these works of man date from BEFORE the Noahic Flood. The reason that no dwellings, etc, have been found is because they were washed away in the Flood. Discoveries that are made nowadays, which still have dwellings, fireplaces, etc. intact, are obviously POST-Deluvian!

I find it fascinating to watch these so-called intellectuals and brilliant minds, tie themselves in knots to come up with some scenario; ANY scenario, for what may have happened there, just as long as they can leave GOD out of their thought processes, and N-E-V-E-R mention the Scriptures or any connection Biblical history might have thereto!

The entire 2nd Chapter of Psalms comes to mind:
Psa 2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
Psa 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
Psa 2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
Psa 2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
Psa 2:5 Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure.
Psa 2:6 Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion.
Psa 2:7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.
Psa 2:8 Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.
Psa 2:9 Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel.
Psa 2:10 Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
Psa 2:11 Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling.
Psa 2:12 Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.


17 posted on 01/03/2012 11:59:44 AM PST by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It would be instructive if one of the “all scientists are moronic fakes” crowd could speculate on what use or reason other than religion could have given rise to this monument. Are these the garden gnomes of the time? Just something to do with folk’s free time?


18 posted on 01/03/2012 12:04:26 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Good article. Thank You.


20 posted on 01/03/2012 12:12:13 PM PST by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They have a carving of Serpent Head Carville.


22 posted on 01/03/2012 6:06:19 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Thanks for posting! Fascinating stuff.


23 posted on 01/03/2012 11:15:15 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (Our GOP candidates: Good grief, is this really the best field we can put together???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

We just watched a show about this on Netflix a couple of days ago. Interesting theories. Thanks for posting!


29 posted on 01/04/2012 8:51:44 PM PST by Peanut Gallery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If National Geographic had more stories like this one, I’d be inclined to subscribe.

Unfortunately every time I see an issue the lead story is always "How Global Warming will Drink Your Baby's Blood and Shoot Your Dog" etc.

37 posted on 01/05/2012 5:34:50 PM PST by denydenydeny (The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Beginning with a structural examination of the pillars, Banning suggests they are placed and buttressed in a manner that would have supported overhead wooden beams, which in turn would have been thatched. There are several hints (ranging from grooves and notches to wood) that this may in fact have been the case, and Banning has sketched one possible layout:
http://genealogyreligion.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Gobekli-draw-better.jpg Göbekli’s T-shaped pillars are arranged in the round and may seem completely unique (which they are in terms of size alone), yet it turns out that similar pillars and arrangements are found at other Neolithic sites in the area, and in several cases these structures are residential.


41 posted on 01/05/2012 8:05:53 PM PST by anglian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson