Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Razzz42
Basically, the way I understand it is, nuclear power results from a controlled nuclear explosion.

A bomb set off in a pile of uranium is not a nuclear bomb. It may be dirty and highly radioactive, but it's not a nuclear explosion. Nuclear power is from controlled fission. A nuclear explosion results from a huge amount of fissioning in a very short period of time. Power rods in a nuclear power plant, whether melted or not, at about 3% enrichment do not have a sufficiently high concentration of fissionable material for this to occur. They would have to have about 30X higher concentration than they do and it wouldn't happen spontaneously: it would take a highly engineered device with critical timing to result in a nuclear explosion.
30 posted on 12/14/2011 4:38:53 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: aruanan

Okay, I partially get it. Even with (re-) criticality you get heat but not an explosion per se, referred to as nuclear excursions.

In a spent fuel pond exists tons and tons of volatile elements that without a moderator present i.e. exposure to air, heat, shock-waves, vacuums, etc. I’m not sure all the possible scenarios have been explored yet.

Thanks for help in understanding guys.


31 posted on 12/14/2011 9:40:22 AM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson