Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Razzz42

No NUCLEAR explosion...

Many things could have caused the explosion...but it wasn’t nuclear in nature.

In essence, you have a large dirty bomb sitting there—any explosion will distribute any adjacent radio nuclides into the atmosphere, which will then ‘fallout’ over the Earths surface depending on where the winds will take them. But it is simply NOT possible for there to be a ‘Nuclear Explosion’.

If they are building a plant to reprocess plutonium, why the HELL aren’t they building a plant (or plants) to reprocess all spent fuel rods from reactor plants? The Navy does it, and has never had an accident doing it for most of a half century now.


20 posted on 12/13/2011 8:02:42 PM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog

No NUCLEAR explosion...

Okay, if you say so but let’s see what they say sent that cloud and debris so far into the sky. Steam?


21 posted on 12/13/2011 8:54:16 PM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog

And I have no idea why they don’t reprocess spent fuel. Probably to expensive with minimal results. Plutonium on the other hand reacts much hotter so maybe it gets a better return on investment versus storing it.

I’m still waiting for the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution report from samplings taken from the ocean and how the Fukushima disaster affect ocean life.


22 posted on 12/13/2011 9:06:51 PM PST by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson