To: stockpirate
Then why was it photographed going behind the building??
To: eastforker
Then why was it photographed going behind the building?? The object definitely appears to be behind the spire in at least 1 frame, with the object showing on both sides of it, the middle part being obscured by the spire...
18 posted on
11/01/2011 7:48:06 PM PDT by
sargon
(I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
To: eastforker
I was thinking meteor. The length is clearly aperture time blur, the little “dots” or “port holes” could be digital artifacts, especially with digital picture compression.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson