Ah, ‘tis refreshing to see analysis done by folks who actually have an understanding of math. As has been amply demonstrated previously, the “sky is falling” group appears to consist of mostly D students.
And of course, the MSM - not even being able to get a D in “Science for Idiots,” goes along for the ride.
But that still didn’t stop Al Gore buying a multi-million dollar condo off the beach.
Tapping wells into fossil water, a water table under, for instance, desert from a time when the area was wetter, is supposed to account for at least a quarter of any measured sea level rise. But I came across that information randomly. I’ve never once heard it mentioned among ‘global warming’ claims.
anybody else remember the temples in India that were momentarily revealed after the Tsunami?
**********************************************
UN Climate Body Struggling to Pinpoint Rising Sea Levels(they don't know)
Sea levels rising? Not exactly
No acceleration of global sea level over the past 100 years (Sorry Algore-Sea levels not rising)
And a contrary :
Climate science 'may have underestimated' damage from rising levels of carbon dioxide (Australia)
CO2 does NOT cause global warming.
Chemical readings by NOBEL PRIZEWINNERS show it was higher in the 1800’s than now!
if even ONE CO2 reading from last century is higher than now, the entire Hoax is revealed. yet there are, and some were made by Nobel Prize winners in Chemistry:
page 5 and 9, show overall CO2:
180 Years accurate CO2 - Gasanalysis of Air
by Chemical Methods (Short version)
http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/180_years_accurate_Co2_Chemical_Methods.pdf
and this one is a good sample of the fraud:
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/11/04/hiding-the-decline-in-washington-dc/
and in addition, to altering 100 year old daa, making them COLDER to increase the “warming trend”, they have also falsified sea-level data:
Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for ‘Adjusted’ Sea-Level Data (The hoax continues)
Fox News ^ | 6/17/2011 | Maxim Lott
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2736328/posts
Picture that happening today.
The generation of a hockey stick can be a big boost to one's career in "Science".
If human CO2 output is 4%, it can easily overwhelm 200 ppm.
Laws of physics and thermodynamics would dictate that the Earth would shrink a bit as it cools.. hence sea water levels should advance, albeit minimally, as the mass of the Earth loses a bit of girth. just a theory. :-)
Remember, this graph has to include every shore at every point for every year...and that's an impossibility.
The theory is only as good as it's ability to accurately extrapolate beyond the data to date.
34cm is about a foot. So even if the sea rise risk were true, WHO CARES? Take the billions saved from stopping the carbon witch hunt and built a 35cm sea wall to save the rich liberals houses in malibu.
I’m still waiting for the actual evidence that sea levels are rising. If that were true, then the UN prediction about having to move people off certain islands by 2010 would have come true, “anthropogenic global warming” or not. (But it didn’t.)
Baloney! I don't believe it. It's not CO2 and it's not anything else other than inter-glacial warming going on for the last 40k years.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is almost exactly the same as the average over the last 40,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.
But you can't convince the political scientists of that - too much money and too many reputations at stake.
They've known all along the Medieval Warm and Little Ice Age threw a wrench in their theories. Hence, the Hockey Stick fraud.
Lawyers for DeChristopher plan an appeal
Global Warming on Free Republic