“Using logical fallacies...”
You fraud. You advocated euthanasia and then came up with a make believe definition.
Let’s see you contradict Webster’s Dictionary:
Euthanasia:
1 [Now Rare] an easy and painless death
2 act or practice of causing death painlessly, so as to end suffering: advocated by some as a way to deal with persons dying of incurable, painful diseases
Tell me again. Do you support euthanasia or not? And even if we go by your make believe definition, do you support the act of taking one’s own life or not?
Do you support the damnation of people who have severe mental disorders who choose to end their pain? Euthanasia, even with your Webster Definition implies that there is a third party assistant. You should probably rethink your view before you get all high and mighty.
And btw if you so choose to judge the dead, you must be much holier than the rest of us.
You guys are killing ME !
Everyone’s life is their own. It it between themselves and God about how it should end.
>> You advocated euthanasia and then came up with a make believe definition.<<
I see you hide behind dictionary definitions since you were busted. You and I both know you meant “euthanasia from the hands of the State or others.” You are not nearly as cute as you think you are.
But since you want to be pure, let me clarify:
* self-euthanasia = no problem. It is an individual’s decision.
* other-euthanasia = unacceptable
There. Now, do you want to twist any other words? And please, let’s not make this a discussion about the discussion. Using a loaded word like “euthanasia” advances no argument, nor have you stated an argument from which we can have a discussion.