Posted on 07/21/2011 8:19:25 PM PDT by quantim
Got one of him saving the rats?
That was my favorite part.
I wondered what J O police were doing watching the pervert creeps in a porn theater. It sounds as stupid as policemen trying to bust criminals at the county jail.
You never did it?
“He played the oddball man-child on television and in two feature films...”
Was he a sign of the future coming of the White Hut messiah?
Does your's? Every bus driver that ever masturbated or watched porn is unfit to have access to children? Seriously? What exactly does a porn theater have to do with children again? Could a child have stumbled upon this act? Does masturbating at porn movies have some known correlation with child molestation?
You ever do anything crazy like make love on a beach? What if you had been caught? Would that make you a danger to children? Most folks, not encumbered by an over active sence of self righteousness, would say no. Molesting children makes one a threat to children, not watching adults do it on a screen over a decade ago.
You remind me of Ben Stiller's character in Dodge Ball. Or the uptight town busybody in the Johnny Depp Chochosomething movie. All you need is some trigger event to send you into a wanking binge the likes of which the world has never seen.
“99% of men and a good chunk of women have engaged in”
Now that’s just sexist! It’s 100% both male and female and everyone here knows it!
Just not in a public place, that’s my only issue.
Sharia law will be a big hit here from the looks of this thread.
What a jerk off.
Lol! "Is there something you want to share with the rest of us, Amazing Larry?!?"
I meant to do that.
Good for Pee Wee. No way in heck I would ever watch the tripe. But good for him.
Yay Pee-Wee. You’ve been missed. Welcome back.
>>> I kinda liked him as the cynical, hard drinking veteran tabloid scandal reporter Chuck Lafoon in the short-lived series “Dirt”.
Absolutely. I was pleasantly surprised. He was excellent. Reubens showed unexpected range as an actor. Not a trace of Pee-Wee in the character. I thought at the time this character could easily have spun off into a new series of his own.
>>> Sigh, I still remember seeing his original burlesque routine (”shoe mirrors!”) on HBO when I was twenty.
Yep :)
>>> “Is it a perverted act to masturbate now?” Yep. It is now, always has been, always will be.
There is more then one sort of jerkoff.
I agree. I hoped this thread would be about the comic genious of Pee Wee but it degraded immediately into a Sharia law wasteland of old hateful Puritans. Probably the same people who hate on the President’s wife’s physical appearance at every opportunity.
I was going to bring up a discussion on how Pee Wee’s age would affect his new movie but I’m out of here now.
Someone once told me that Masturbation was a non-maliscious Natural act.
If we condemn everyone who masturbated we would condemn just about everyone.
Now like any other act it can be carried to extremes.Perhaps Peewee did that, he was punished harshly for his actions. Hasn’t he been punished enough?
Judge not lest ye be Judged. Certainly masturbation is not gay,or unmanly,if not carried to extremes it is not pathetic, and most foreplay between men and women is masturbation to a certain extent. Perhaps you do not believe in foreplay I don’t know.
It is probably the first sex act every young boy discovers as he slowly realizes he is a man one day ,and wakes from a night where nocturnal emissions gave him a clue that he was becoming a man.
I cannot spoeak for women, because I am not one, but I would think that a man who had never Masturbated was indeed in the minority.
As we grow and are warned about the horrible dangers of it’s overuse by our religious and moral leaders we tend to cut back on it’s use ,but few give it up entirely.
#10 - When you put it that way, he doesn’t seem “as bad” as the other creeps. Still, it’s like the question to that murderer’s attorney the other day “Would you want them to babysit your kids?” Not really. If the free market supports his movie, so be it. For me, it’s a non-starter. In my eyes, he broke any potential trust of any parent on what they’d want to “expose” their children to. Just...yuck.
I just think there's more concern on the part of parents as to who they subsidize for entertaining their children. My comment isn't hateful or puritan, but can be summed up by one word: "yuck..."
Hey, if he can get a paycheck out of some Hollywood types willing to invest in a movie, more power to him. I'll pass. I thought his show was pretty creative, too bad he aborted his family appeal the way he did.
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.