Replies

I must say, this is the most interesting discussion I’ve ever engaged in.

——————At this point you’re I really don’t think we’re going to get option three. (No internet kill switch.)-————

“Nothing is inevitable until it happens.” - Thomas Sowell

-————————As for net neutrality all I can say is that I’m sorry you see it that way.-——————

I don’t have a choice. These six pieces of information:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2733953/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2713730/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2729438/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2711488/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2699462/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2699677/posts

Form the basis for my beliefs on this, because they’re all fact. Not opinion. In their own words or their own documents, these people are as serious as a heart attack, they are not on the side of freedom, and they have large amounts of real power to implement their schemes.

And, they have a completely different definition of net neutrality than you do.

If you learn *THEIR* definition of net neutrality, as I have endeavoured to do, you will oppose it too.

——————I AM supporting a particular idea that says “you can’t censor data or discriminate access based on what you have to say.”—————

If you learn what these people really mean when they talk about “net neutrality”, you will see that they reject that idea. If they want to control the on/off ramps, they HAVE to reject that idea. It can’t be both ways. History is very clear on this.