Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USMC To US Army: You Can’t Use OUR Camo; Army To USMC: The H— We Can’t!
bigpeace.com ^ | June 8, 2011 | Peter Schweizer

Posted on 06/08/2011 5:34:56 PM PDT by PROCON

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: PROCON; ConorMacNessa; HiJinx

Only if they become Marines!!!


21 posted on 06/08/2011 5:58:56 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative; mkmensinger
Excuse me? I will stack my tabs up against anything any jarhead can put up, thank you. Any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

LOL, I knew this thread might get interesting; I'm with you Army Bro!

22 posted on 06/08/2011 6:00:53 PM PDT by PROCON (Liberals Mistake Education and Knowledge for Wisdom and Common Sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative

Agreed.

RLTW


23 posted on 06/08/2011 6:01:34 PM PDT by military cop (I carry a .45....cause they don't make a .46....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Army has been using Crye Multicam in Afghanistan for over a year.


24 posted on 06/08/2011 6:02:12 PM PDT by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5

Yeah, I know. Why not just adopt it as the standard duty uniform?


25 posted on 06/08/2011 6:07:56 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mware

One of my soldiers took an Iraqi .380 to the left side of his K-pot. It knocked him down and he wound up with a hell of a headache and sore neck but he was otherwise fine. The round did compromise the K-pot and he had to turn it in and get another one, but no big deal. I don’t know if he would been as lucky had be been wearing the old steel pot.

I really did not much care for the new PASGT. The Army cut them down to save on weight, but they were higher on the sides and in the back. Fine I guess if you do crazy stuff like jump out of perfectly good airplanes. And since we no longer used MILES gear, opting for VERY COOL paintball guns (which looked and felt exactly like an M4, ans which stung like crap when they hit you) less helmet in the back was no big deal. And the weight savings was less than a pound. Even wearing the new ones for 16 hours at a pop I never felt any appreciable difference.


26 posted on 06/08/2011 6:11:04 PM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On!.................Saracuda 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Their covers are different and they roll their sleeves differently so it would not be hard to tell the two services apart if they wore the same cammies.


27 posted on 06/08/2011 6:11:28 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I would bet it would come down to cost. How much is a set of Multicams compared to a set of those cheaply made ACU’s?


28 posted on 06/08/2011 6:13:48 PM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On!.................Saracuda 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

The Army does not roll up their sleeves any more. That was done away with around 2006 or so. We were the only branch of the services which did not.


29 posted on 06/08/2011 6:15:45 PM PDT by NWFLConservative (Game On!.................Saracuda 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

I wonder how much money the federal government would save if the Army, Marines, and Air Force (Navy/Coast Guard do have a legit reason for a different pattern) all used the exact same duty uniform. I’m guessing a large number of zeros would be involved.

I really don’t see what the issue would be; each could keep its different service and dress uniforms, which is where the real history and tradition of the service is from a uniform point of view. Hell, let them keep their own head gear too; you can easily tell them all apart from that.


30 posted on 06/08/2011 6:17:53 PM PDT by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative

Certainly the Crye uniforms are going to run a lot more with their features. Why not simply use the ACU design with MultiCam pattern fabric...or even go back to the BDU design with the MultiCam pattern?


31 posted on 06/08/2011 6:18:19 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

They need to get past the pissin’ contest and do what’s best for the war fighters.


32 posted on 06/08/2011 6:22:11 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative

The reason ACUs are poorly made isn’t because of the low price. It’s because the government gives favoritism in purchasing to companies that employ people with disabilities. The tag that says ‘Proudly made by the Vision Impaired’ explains, imho, why every single set I ever buy is stitched together wrong in at least one place. Usually at the wrists.

Maybe I’m just a dick.


33 posted on 06/08/2011 6:22:41 PM PDT by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Good camouflage is good camouflage...UCP is just plain useless.


34 posted on 06/08/2011 6:23:45 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mkmensinger

oh please


35 posted on 06/08/2011 6:24:39 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative

LOL! I stand corrected, my FRiend.


36 posted on 06/08/2011 6:24:53 PM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NWFLConservative
The Army does not roll up their sleeves any more.

Even in the hot months in the middle east?

Sheesh, in Vietnam, we usually went around in t-shirts, or often shirtless; of course we didn't carry around all the gear you grunts did..:=)

37 posted on 06/08/2011 6:25:35 PM PDT by PROCON (Liberals Mistake Education and Knowledge for Wisdom and Common Sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Just a bit of good natured kidding.


38 posted on 06/08/2011 6:25:51 PM PDT by mkmensinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Melas
I would thing that camo patterns would be all about breaking up the visual lines human eyes use to differentiate objects. If the Marine camouflage is truly better, then so be it. They’re all on the same side.

I would agree if you could convince me that camoflage (tricking human visual perception) is more science than art -- which it isn't. Plus camoflage uniforms are necessarily a compromise based on the surroundings that are anticipated in combat theaters which the forces are oriented on. This would mean that there is plenty of room for variation while still having effective camoflage for the 2 major land combat forces.

39 posted on 06/08/2011 6:27:12 PM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
They need to get past the pissin’ contest and do what’s best for the war fighters.

My heart says they will, despite 0bozo's interference.

40 posted on 06/08/2011 6:29:27 PM PDT by PROCON (Liberals Mistake Education and Knowledge for Wisdom and Common Sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson