Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Colt CM901
1 posted on 05/26/2011 6:45:37 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: KeyLargo
"combat rifles"

As opposed to an assault rifle?

2 posted on 05/26/2011 6:47:29 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

They will pick something Soros owns.


4 posted on 05/26/2011 6:48:32 AM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I’m recalling that awhile back there was an article here that said that even the Army says the M4 “sucks.”


5 posted on 05/26/2011 6:48:50 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

They will pick something Soros owns.


6 posted on 05/26/2011 6:48:59 AM PDT by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Microsoft had an issue and they realized that they weren’t in the game enough. They now have one of the largest corporate lobbying presences in DC. Lesson learned, in order to do business, you have to play sewerball in the swamps of Maryland.


7 posted on 05/26/2011 6:49:58 AM PDT by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

The headline is interesting. It states that Colt is ‘on the outs’, implying they are ‘in trouble’ with the DoD, but the story does not explain what, if anything, they did wrong. Based on what I can find on-line it appears Colt’s current contract for M4s is set to expire some time in 2013 and the DoD wants to have a ‘new’ combat rifle ready for production by the time that happens.

Is it really all that unusual for the military to seek a successor to the M4 after almost 20 years in production? And is it really all the surprising that Colt might want a piece of the action (hence the lobbyist)?

It certainly does not appear that the DoD is terminating Colt’s current contract early or anything like that, so I am not sure what ‘on the outs’ is supposed to mean.


13 posted on 05/26/2011 7:14:19 AM PDT by WayneS ("I hope you know this will go down on your PERMANENT record...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

I thought FN Herstal was making the M16 for the US Military?


21 posted on 05/26/2011 7:25:32 AM PDT by donozark (I was Amelia Earhart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

more connecticut jobs down the sewer.


23 posted on 05/26/2011 7:34:10 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

Why not something in 7.62 x 39? Enemy weapons cache = ammo re-supply in the field.


27 posted on 05/26/2011 7:39:19 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo

This country has NOT WON a war since we got rid of the M-1 Garand, The Browning Automatic Rifle and the Thompson Sub-Machine Gun. Go back to these and get rid of WOMEN in the “military” and we just MAY start winning wars again.


30 posted on 05/26/2011 7:41:49 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KeyLargo
There is only one serious choice for a new battle rifle:

Mosin Nagant.

;-)

57 posted on 05/26/2011 10:19:07 AM PDT by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson