[Marathoner]

Someone sent Boortz an email that I wish I could take credit for. Basically he/she said that if opposing abortion is stupid because the Rats can say you’re anti-woman, then why oppose the EPA since they’ll say you’re anti-environment, or oppose the Dept of Education since they’ll say you’re anti-education.

[Old Teufel Hunden]

"Someone sent Boortz an email that I wish I could take credit for. Basically he/she said that if opposing abortion is stupid because the Rats can say you’re anti-woman, then why oppose the EPA since they’ll say you’re anti-environment, or oppose the Dept of Education since they’ll say you’re anti-education."

In other words, why allow the left to define the debate. It's just another excuse for Boortz not to actually debate the issue. If he allows debate, he will come to the logical conclusion that abortion is murder and he doesn't want to face that cold hard truth. It doesn't square with his libertarian ideas, or so he believes.

He forgets the part in the Declaration of Independence where Jefferson writes that We as a people hold these self truths to be evident. That we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights and among them are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Now if our government is not supposed to protect our unalienable right to life, what is it there for?