To: laweeks
if a boy, why not get a haircut with all of his/her/its money?
The mid sixties must have been a very bad time for you.
Not to mention Beatle Boots.
16 posted on
02/14/2011 9:56:15 AM PST by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Lazlo in PA; laweeks
Regardless of hairstyle, none of the Beatles looked like girls.
18 posted on
02/14/2011 9:58:48 AM PST by
Sloth
(If a tax cut constitutes "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should count as a "desposit.")
To: Lazlo in PA
They came on the scene when I was in school and I did not like them then or now. They should have had haircuts, too.
27 posted on
02/14/2011 10:02:00 AM PST by
MamaB
To: Lazlo in PA
The mid sixties must have been a very bad time for you. I wonder how many here realize that probably two-thirds of the males in the Western nations under 25 had Bieber hair, er, Beatle hair, from about 1965 and for ten or more years afterward.
And have they ever taken a peek at portraits of our founding fathers?
37 posted on
02/14/2011 10:10:49 AM PST by
Will88
To: Lazlo in PA
the beatles did not wear lip gloss.
43 posted on
02/14/2011 10:16:48 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Lazlo in PA
I had no idea Emo Phillips toured with Paul, John, and George.
To: Lazlo in PA
I raised my kids on Beatles and Brasilian music. They adore the Beatles and were heartbroken when I told them they broke up. Even harder on them that it was over 40 years ago!
Classics never die. Who will remember Lady GaGa in 40 years except her nurse?
81 posted on
02/14/2011 12:01:26 PM PST by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson