Obama's reputed father was never a US citizen. At the very least, Obama's eligibility should be challenged and brought to SCOTUS, since the courts have never ruled on exactly what constitutes a "natural born citizen" under the Constitution as it pertains to the Presidency.
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
” the courts have never ruled on what constitutes a” natural born citizen”
The Supreme court has never specially addressed a case that was based solely on the meaning of Natural born.
BUT......
The Supreme court has defined the meaning of Natural Born a number of time.
for example: Minor vs Happensett
CHILDREN WHOM PARENTS ARE U.S CITIZENS ARE CONSIDERED NATURAL BORN. Parent(s) means both of them!!
” the courts have never ruled on what constitutes a” natural born citizen”
The Supreme court has never specially addressed a case that was based solely on the meaning of Natural born.
BUT......
The Supreme court has defined the meaning of Natural Born a number of time.
for example: Minor vs Happensett
CHILDREN WHOM PARENTS ARE U.S CITIZENS ARE CONSIDERED NATURAL BORN. Parent(s) means both of them!!