Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many cancer cells found to have an 'eat me' signal in Stanford study
Stanford University Medical Center ^ | December 22, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 12/22/2010 2:36:19 PM PST by decimon

STANFORD, Calif. — Researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have discovered that many cancer cells carry the seeds of their own destruction — a protein on the cell surface that signals circulating immune cells to engulf and digest them. On cancer cells, this "eat me" signal is counteracted by a separate "don't eat me" signal that was described in an earlier study. The two discoveries may lead to better cancer therapies, and also solve a mystery about why a previously reported cancer therapy is not more toxic.

In the study to be published Dec. 22 in Science Translational Medicine, the researchers discovered that many forms of cancer display the protein calreticulin, or CRT, which invites immune cells called macrophages to engulf and destroy them. The reason most cancer cells are not destroyed by macrophages is that they also display another molecule, a "don't eat me" signal, called CD47, which counteracts the CRT signal.

The characterization of the function of CD47 protein in cancer was previously published by the Stanford scientists. In the earlier work, they reported that an antibody that blocks CD47 could be a potent anti-cancer therapy. They demonstrated that the anti-CD47 antibody could eliminate disease in mice transplanted with human acute myeloid leukemia and cure a large proportion of mice with human non-Hodgkin's lymphoma when combined with a second antibody.

Although the result was exciting, it presented a couple mysteries. "Many normal cells in the body have CD47, and yet those cells are not affected by the anti-CD47 antibody," said Mark Chao, a Stanford MD/PhD candidate who is first author of the new paper. "At that time, we knew that anti-CD47 antibody treatment selectively killed only cancer cells without being toxic to most normal cells, although we didn't know why."

The researchers also questioned whether simply blocking CD47 would be enough to bring on a cell's destruction. "It wouldn't be likely that killing cells was the default action of the immune system," said Ravindra Majeti, MD, PhD, assistant professor of hematology and co-principal investigator on the project. "We postulated that there had to be an 'eat me' signal that the cancer cells were also carrying in addition to CD47." CRT became the leading candidate for this signal because other researchers had previously shown that CRT and CD47 work together to govern a process of programmed cell death called apoptosis.

Indeed, when the scientists looked for CRT they found it on a variety of cancers, including several leukemias, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and bladder, brain and ovarian cancers. "This research demonstrates that the reason that blocking the CD47 'don't eat me' signal works to kill cancer is that leukemias, lymphomas and many solid tumors also display a calreticulin 'eat me' signal," said Irving Weissman, MD, director of the Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine and the study's other co-principal investigator. "The research also shows that most normal cell populations don't display calreticulin and are therefore not depleted when we expose them to a blocking anti-CD47 antibody."

The researchers also found that the most aggressive cancers were the ones making the most CRT. This raises hopes that some of the worst cancers may be the most vulnerable to therapies targeting CD47 and CRT.

But it also raises new mysteries: Why would cancer cells carry a protein that invites their own destruction, and why would the worst cancers make more of this protein? One possibility is that CRT is a part of the cell's regulatory system that cancers have figured a way around. When normal cells become damaged, CRT protein gets exposed on the cell surface, which marks the cell to be eaten and ultimately destroyed. This is one of many ways the immune system keeps abnormal cells in check. "In cancer, CRT expression may be a marker of this process, requiring cancer cells to make more CD47 to avoid getting eaten," said Chao. "It's also possible that CRT confers some unknown advantage on cancer, which is an area we are actively investigating."

One next step for the researchers will be to understand how CRT and CD47 dynamically balance each other's influence in patients undergoing chemotherapy, the standard treatment for most cancers. This may provide greater chances of success as they move toward a clinical trial of the anti-CD47 antibody in cancer patients.

The scientists also want to learn more about the biology of CRT in cancer. "We want to know how it contributes to the disease process and what is happening in the cell that causes the protein to move to the cell surface," Majeti said. "Any of these mechanisms offer potential new ways to treat the disease by interfering with those processes."

###

Other Stanford investigators contributing to this research were pathology resident Siddhartha Jaiswal, MD, PhD; high school student Rachel Weissman-Tsukamoto; acting assistant professor of medicine Ash Alizadeh, MD, PhD; postdoctoral scholars Andrew Gentles, PhD, Jens Volkmer, MD, Stephen Willingham, PhD, and Tal Raveh, PhD; and medical student Kipp Weiskopf.

The research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, the American Association for Cancer Research and the Ludwig Foundation. Information about Stanford's Department of Medicine, which also supported the work, is available at http://medicine.stanford.edu.

The Stanford University School of Medicine consistently ranks among the nation's top medical schools, integrating research, medical education, patient care and community service. For more news about the school, please visit http://mednews.stanford.edu. The medical school is part of Stanford Medicine, which includes Stanford Hospital & Clinics and Lucile Packard Children's Hospital. For information about all three, please visit http://stanfordmedicine.org/about/news.html.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: cancer; cancercells; immunesystem

1 posted on 12/22/2010 2:36:21 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; DvdMom; grey_whiskers; Ladysmith; Roos_Girl

Ping


2 posted on 12/22/2010 2:36:49 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

3 posted on 12/22/2010 2:39:09 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This thread could have potential.


4 posted on 12/22/2010 2:44:02 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Barack Obama - Racing to beat Jimmy Carter for 'Worst President Ever')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

The more we learn about a single human cell, the more questions we have, and, IMHO, the less it is likely that a human cell developed all by itself.


5 posted on 12/22/2010 2:45:56 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

“Many cancer cells found to have an ‘eat me’ signal”

So they are gay? Who knew?


6 posted on 12/22/2010 2:47:56 PM PST by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MPJackal

Don’t ask, don’t cell.


7 posted on 12/22/2010 2:49:57 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It’s nice to see that I’m not the only one to think of Animal House on reading the headline.


8 posted on 12/22/2010 2:50:27 PM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Man them cells got an attiyude. ;>)


9 posted on 12/22/2010 3:13:12 PM PST by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat

future anti-cancer drugs will look like a pac man


10 posted on 12/22/2010 4:11:00 PM PST by ak267
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

GMTA


11 posted on 12/22/2010 4:27:13 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ak267

Speaking of, I saw a commercial on TV for some beauty cream for women and it said that the cream created new cells that filled in wrinkle lines, or something to that effect. My first thought is that this could cause cancer, couldn’t it—unrestricted cell growth?


12 posted on 12/22/2010 4:30:20 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: decimon

“Other Stanford investigators contributing to this research were ... high school student Rachel Weissman-Tsukamoto...”


13 posted on 12/22/2010 4:46:02 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Mr. Moto not amused.


14 posted on 12/22/2010 4:53:14 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson