[NavyCanDo]

She is quite talented, and cute in a “girl next door” sort of way, which is why she is a good fit for the role.

Not crazy though about all this 3D stuff. As if movies were not expensive enough, now they figured out a way to charge you between $4 to $10 more a ticket just because it's in 3D. And the public just laps it up.

And its not great 3D like we had in the 50s and 60s, where the filmmaker teased the audience with sharp pointy things, slimy things,animals with fangs, and such. And they would be right at you face, and you would here the audience react with fright each occurrence. Now they just sit there, with zero response, but yet you here them as they walk out say ,”wow, the 3D was cool dude”. They don't know what cool 3D is.

[a fool in paradise]

And its not great 3D like we had in the 50s and 60s, where the filmmaker teased the audience with sharp pointy things, slimy things,animals with fangs, and such. And they would be right at you face, and you would here the audience react with fright each occurrence. Now they just sit there, with zero response, but yet you here them as they walk out say ,”wow, the 3D was cool dude”. They don't know what cool 3D is.

I'm waiting for Ted Turner to rerelease Citizen Kane in 3-D.

[Erasmus]

And its not great 3D like we had in the 50s and 60s, where the filmmaker teased the audience with sharp pointy things, slimy things,animals with fangs, and such.

Boobs. You forgot boobs.

[Lee'sGhost]

“And its not great 3D like we had in the 50s and 60s, where the filmmaker teased the audience with sharp pointy things, slimy things,animals with fangs, and such.”

Interesting. That’s why I LIKE the new 3-D. It’s there to add depth and texture...not as a novelty. In other words, it enhances the story rather than detract from it with unrelated or unnecessary 3-D gimmick images.