Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karl Rove -- When did FreeRepublic learn to hate you?
FreeRepublic ^ | 9/17/10 | Dryman

Posted on 09/17/2010 4:45:56 PM PDT by Dryman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 last
To: DManA

Yes Castle is a socialist in my book as well. I would rather risk losing backing a true conservative then let Castle return to the Senate as a Republican. Rove is wrong as I have said repeatedly throughout this thread.


241 posted on 09/18/2010 8:43:21 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: LatinaGOP

I love a good caste system, don’t you?


242 posted on 09/18/2010 8:43:40 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Mitt Romney may indeed be behind the Toyko ROVE attacks on winning candidate O’Donnell.

Robert Stacy McCain thinks so. He wrote a piece in the American Spectator about it.

The Delaware Fury: Is This Really About 2012?

Whether it's Romney or someone else in the establishment (I think it's Romney because it fits his MO), you simply have to look at a map, the GOP primary schedule and Palin's endorsements in places that just happen to be key primary states to see why TPTB in the GOP is panicked.

243 posted on 09/18/2010 8:46:28 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

Without doing some research the BIG one is, as I mentioned was Specter. Completely unnecessary, completely wrong, a complete disaster as it turned out.


244 posted on 09/18/2010 9:46:51 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: DManA

I could also be argued that rallying the GOP around Specter also cost Santorum his seat.


245 posted on 09/18/2010 9:50:28 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

If that one doesn’t betray a statist motive, at least it betrays a serious lack of judgment on Rove’s part.


246 posted on 09/18/2010 9:55:03 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Dryman

I don’t hate Rove, I just think he’s got his priorities mixed up. There are a number of other conservatives who echo Rove’s attitude (notably Charles Krauthammer), but I think they’re simply wrong...not evil.


247 posted on 09/18/2010 11:38:30 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long-term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR
Winnning is what matters - and for those of you who think that Castle is no better than Coons or that O’Donnell has a reasonable chance to win or that it is better to have liberal democrat than a turncoat fake Republican, well you’re simply delusional.

Well, then I guess Rush and I and many thoughtful well-informed FReepers are delusional.

No, on second thought, YOU are delusional, because you are one who mistakes solid, "Hey, wait a minute ... fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice ..." awakening of people (like me) who've voted fearfully (AKA "pragmatically") and been rendered suckers for decades now, and caused the Republican party to move steadily left ... left ... left, for "inane emotional rants." You stupidly and arrogantly equate with mere emotionalism our recongition that "winning" on those terms is the same as losing.

Meanwhile YOU are so emotionally vested in winning at any cost that you count as a win the election of a Republican who will vote with the Democrats; and as far as I can tell ONLY out of pure emotion, would count the election of a person who voted the same but who was registered as a Democrat, as a loss. From where I'm sitting, it looks as if YOU have a delusional, emotional take on the concept of winning and losing.

248 posted on 09/18/2010 12:09:34 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Thanks for the ping, DioG.


249 posted on 09/18/2010 12:21:03 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Finny

It’s simple. If you control the Senate there are tangible benefits that will help to advance the conservative agenda. Research it.


250 posted on 09/18/2010 3:37:13 PM PDT by PAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Dryman

I have been a member longer than you and am still awaiting my reply.


251 posted on 09/20/2010 1:03:27 PM PDT by fideist (Pro-Life, Pro-Gun, Pro-American, Pro-Palin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fideist

you stated your case very well.

I disagree and view his comments differently. Thanks for your input.


252 posted on 09/20/2010 10:12:36 PM PDT by Dryman ("FREE THE LONG FORM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-252 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson