Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Look What They Found on the Moon!
http://channels.isp.netscape.com ^ | 8 / 23 / 2010 | --From the Editors at Netscape

Posted on 08/23/2010 11:07:10 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: OldDeckHand

I was specifically referring to this part of the announcement:

” ... this all changed when actual measurements were taken using the Mini-SAR and Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3 or “M-cubed”) instruments on India’s Chandrayaan-1 moon probe ... “


41 posted on 08/23/2010 12:36:21 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KingLudd
I thought they were going to say Obama’s birth certificate.
42 posted on 08/23/2010 12:37:22 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar
"I was specifically referring to this part of the announcement:"

Right. LCROSS examined parts of the moon that had never been fully explored before, and certainly different areas than the cursory & superficial exploration made by the Astronauts. Simply put, the Astronauts had no way to examine anything much below a few inches to a foot of ancient lunar "dust", nor did they have any ability to look deeply into these craters on the dark side of the Moon, where some of this water is now known to exist in frozen state.

It's much like standing on top of a Blue Ridge mountain peak in the 10th century BC, and not seeing any coal, although clearly we now know centuries later coal is incredibly abundant in that region. The same could be said about the aquifers located beneath Death Valley. Standing in Death Valley, one would be hard pressed to find much water. But it's there - plenty of it. You just need to know where to look.

43 posted on 08/23/2010 12:46:47 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Ok thanks for the information. It is much appreciated.


44 posted on 08/23/2010 12:53:11 PM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: frithguild
Moon Base Alpha!

Yup.

Open 1999. Closed by Obama's budget cuts 2010.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

45 posted on 08/23/2010 1:49:47 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT
They will now try to get the moon declared a wetlands so that no development can take place!

That's *not* funny.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

46 posted on 08/23/2010 1:54:08 PM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Of all the remakes they are making, you think they would have done Space 1999 already, but maybe they’d have to call it Space 2099?


47 posted on 08/23/2010 1:58:07 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
Thanks ATOMIC_PUNK. The Earth by contrast had over 330 million cubic miles of water.
Scientists don't know why some of the lunar craters contain pure ice, while others have an ice-soil mixture.
Some are more recent than others.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

48 posted on 08/23/2010 2:52:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
"Of all the remakes they are making, you think they would have done Space 1999 already, but maybe they’d have to call it Space 2099?"

They have been trying to remake it since the early 90's. It was going to be called "Space:2009", but that ship has sailed, clearly. I've heard they're still trying to get it launched, but it's in the embryonic stage.

I agree though, it's surprising it hasn't been done already considering I saw a remake of "The A Team" just a few weeks ago.

49 posted on 08/23/2010 2:58:24 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

There are actual reports claiming to have seen our folks living there running around loose outside of dwellings without helmets.


50 posted on 08/23/2010 2:58:30 PM PDT by Quix (C THE PLAN of the Bosses: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2519352/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


51 posted on 08/23/2010 3:27:58 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Bookmark

I'm confident water isn't the only valuable resource on, in, or under the lunar surface.

52 posted on 08/23/2010 3:32:51 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

That has yet to be discovered.


53 posted on 08/23/2010 3:33:25 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Whoops! Thanks KoRn!


54 posted on 08/23/2010 3:56:10 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: J Edgar

There’s not a lot of water on the Moon, just more than previously thought. And it’s still not a lot. The Moon, having 1/100th the mass of the Earth, doesn’t hold on to gas, and water winds up transitioning directly from ice to vapor pretty easily in a vacuum or near-vacuum.

The Apollo missions didn’t spend an awful lot of time on the surface, and much of that was spent in rock retrieval, plus they had to photograph each rock six or eight times. :’) The main discovery was that impact was over 99 percent dominant in the “geology” of the Moon.


55 posted on 08/23/2010 4:00:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Because neither one can whistle, is the official answer. Though, as the book/computer points out, the laser could be used to modulate a noise source and thus create a whistle.


56 posted on 08/24/2010 7:18:59 AM PDT by Pecos (Liberty and Honor will not die on my watch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson