His position that the pot is terminally active has some merit, enough anyways for someone as trained as you to understand why a novice would become engrossed with it.
You chose to belittle him....as you have attempted with me quite a few times but certainly not to that degree as you did him.
I must surmise then that at one point before my knowledge of this board, he must have disagreed with you as well...lol
Had you looked at my intial replies, I was attempting to educate him by pointing him to the views of those who study YS full time, that such events were common and not in themselves a sign of emminent activity - contrary to the title of his thread. I tried to explain the absence of magmatic harmonic signatures and that the seismographs record quakes from around the world and that to fixate on that alone, separate from the data stream from the experts who have all the data and tools to analyze it was wrong. It was only after he blew off my attempts did my frustration break through. I believe he and I have come to an understanding, so I consider that issue to be at closure.