Still waiting for any support for your “harmonic symptom of a larger underlying wave function”. Guess it’ll be a while. I charge for research. Do your own, I'm busy.
Start here:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100107143909.htm
http://scienceray.com/earth-sciences/geology/san-andreas-fault-mega-thrust-earthquake-2010/
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TJ4-4KPPMN2-2&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F28%2F2007&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1397854660&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=49c6cbe4d74b4552e3da93a16a6f852a
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
If you're charging to do research, folks should get their money back. Let's just take a quick look see and determine if the "research" you've provided can shed any light on your claim that the alignment of the planets can somehow, through a "harmonic symptom of a larger underlying wave function", raise the likelihood of an earthquake.
The first dealing with nanoscale symmetry resulting from Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle doesn't seem to discuss your claim.
The second I discarded after I got to this: "Whilst I am not claiming to be an seismologist or an earthquake expert..."
The third, a response to an earlier piece discussing string theory, I'm gonna have to lump with the first - nothing in the abstract about earthquakes OR the alignment of the planets. Of course, that was just the abstract, perhaps in the text we are told what happens when the Moon is in the Second House, and Jupiter aligns with Mars...
(I gotta say it's patently obvious that neither Marilyn McCoo nor Billy Davis, Jr. are actual physicists, but if they were and had listened to you, the band may have been called the Ji-huan He’s Eleven Dimensional Cantorian Spacetime Theory Quintet.)
Finally, as a working scientist I am often reminded that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. You've made the claim - now provide the proof.