“acceptable debate”
In the final analysis, I believe Jim Robinson is said arbiter. Free speech is paramount. But free speech is not always prudent speech.
Sarah Palin is pro 2nd Amendment, anti-abortion, anti-illegal immigration, pro balanced budget, and is a bona fide conservative on these and most other issues one would tend to choose. She is a thorn in Obama, the liberals and liberal medias buttholes, much more so than any other so called conservative with the possible exception of Rush, Malkin, Hannity, and Beck. The difference is hers resonate effectively.
The critics herein do not attack her on the issues; they attack her personally using such terms as “Precious”, etc. Maybe she will run and get nominated; maybe she won’t. But she is by far the most effective weapon in the conservative arsenal at this point in time. I take the approach that the worst player on our team is better than the regime on the other team.
We may not survive the next two years. We definitely will not survive if @$$h0le gets re-elected.
Well, I can’t disagree with any of that.
I am ambivelent right now. I really can’t think 2012 until 2010 is over.
If the GOP should win big, 2012 hopes for any candidate will depend on whether they do what they promised to win in 2010.
If they fail at that, which they might, considering the non stop passel of RINOs they dish out, all bets are off for 2012.