Actually you make me sick.
Sarah Palin better learn to take the criticism of past performance and policy. The good with the bad, it will help her grow and shape into a formidable candidate. You can't browbeat and force people to walk in lockstep with you. To be a good candidate, the candidate has to win over the people who are not convinced.
If you can't do that, you might not win.
There is a huge difference between those that make stuff up about her personally or use sexism to demean her.
Other stuff is fair game.
We have yet to have a 2012 primary season start. She will take criticism from those in her own party. That is just the way it is. You are creating a thin skin for her. I doubt she asked for people to do that. You remind me of an obamabot. Only difference is you think you are above that because you aren't shilling for Obozo. Ideology may be different, but your method is familiar.
Um...I’m not suggesting anyone walk in lockstep with me, I’m only saying there’s a profound difference between critics and the haters. Many of the Palin “critics” on FR are in fact haters who see her as an enemy that must be crushed for good.
It’s like the difference between people who hate Obama’s policies versus the people who just hate him because he’s black.
Since when has Palin haters objectively looked at her record as city councilwoman, Mayor, regulator, and Governor? When have they pointed out something she did wrong policy wise? The answer is never.
All of the criticisms leveled at Sarah are subjective. They say she's a quitter, she's not ready, she supports RINOs, she needs to hire a speech coach, etc. I have no problems with FReepers actually discussing her record. But they keep repeating the same left-wing garbage over and over again.
What on earth did the poster do? Let's take the poster's first paragraph.
Apparently the poster is saying that fanaticism both for and against Palin is not a good thing. What in the name of common sense is wrong with that??
Still waiting lindy.