Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

55% Of Americans Say 'Revolution' If Obama Somehow Gets New UN Gun Ban Treaty Ratified In the U.S.
U.S.E. News ^ | June 12th | U.S. of Earth

Posted on 06/15/2010 1:43:54 PM PDT by DebraAI

The new United Nations Treaty is being designed to disarm all citizens of every nation on Earth. The treaty will give all governments a free hand to do as they please. It is making headway in Washington D.C. and it is feared that President Obama may very well try to use the treaty to consolidate his power in America. The treaty specifics are now being negotiated and Obama has given the OK For the U.S. to be a part of the negotiations.

(Excerpt) Read more at usofearth.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: banglist; bho44; bhofascism; bhotreason; bhotyranny; cwii; cwiiping; democrats; donttreadonme; guncontrol; liberalfascism; lping; obama; politics; shallnotbeinfringed; troll; tyranny; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
This is about a poll conducted on what American citizens would do if Obama somehow managed to get the UN Treaty that is being written now passed in the Senate. I wouldn't put it past them as no one thought they'd ram Health Care down our throats. Who knows what arm twisting they could pull off. I don't think Americans believe he can pull it off. I sure hope not but with all that is going on I am not totally optimistic that he will fail.
1 posted on 06/15/2010 1:43:54 PM PDT by DebraAI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DebraAI
And how many dictators has the United Nations removed from power?

Oh wait, they are a PRO-dictator organization and anti-US. Get them out of here. Corrupt to the bone.

2 posted on 06/15/2010 1:45:59 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

It could pass the Senate.


3 posted on 06/15/2010 1:46:04 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

Every blade of grass.


4 posted on 06/15/2010 1:46:07 PM PDT by muddler (Obama is either incompetent or malicious, and it makes little difference which.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI
This is about a poll conducted on what American citizens would do if Obama somehow managed to get the UN Treaty that is being written now passed in the Senate.

Pass it in the House and Senate, and then 'FIX' it like they did with Obamacare. Get the votes now before they lose their majorities...

5 posted on 06/15/2010 1:46:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

Remember, it’s two thirds necessary for ratification, not the 60 they used for Obamacare. Unless something untoward happens to the entire Republican delegation, this will NEVER be ratified.


6 posted on 06/15/2010 1:47:15 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS....


7 posted on 06/15/2010 1:47:33 PM PDT by Cheesel (So this how democracy dies...with thunderous applause, March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

It’s quite evident that 0 can do whatever he pleases, despite all the Texas-style tough talk from opponents.


8 posted on 06/15/2010 1:48:17 PM PDT by balls (It's Amateur Hour at the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“Unless something untoward happens to the entire Republican delegation, this will NEVER be ratified.”

See the 14th Amendment!


9 posted on 06/15/2010 1:49:17 PM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

There is a mechanism whereby the President can make this happen (a treaty) unilaterally and have force of law, no congress required.


10 posted on 06/15/2010 1:49:18 PM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

I only know that Hussein’s gun collectors will have a very bad time when they come up my driveway.


11 posted on 06/15/2010 1:49:47 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

Not a Revolution. A Rebellion.


12 posted on 06/15/2010 1:50:00 PM PDT by Cuchulain ("...never treat with the enemy; never surrender to his mercy, but fight to the finish.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

Koo Koo...Koo Koo...Koo Koo.
Who did they poll? The article and the web site seem even too kooky for me.


13 posted on 06/15/2010 1:50:00 PM PDT by Greg123456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

I don’t even own a gun. But if they get this through, I’ll meet you guys at the mall in DC. We’ll make sure they hear us.


14 posted on 06/15/2010 1:50:32 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

“There is a mechanism whereby the President can make this happen (a treaty) unilaterally and have force of law, no congress required.”

Would that be the Treaty Czar?


15 posted on 06/15/2010 1:51:02 PM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI
No they won't. If gun confiscation occurs then 95% of gun owners will willingly turn over their guns for “compensation,” even if that's just an agreement to not be prosecuted and spending years in prison. The rest will hide their guns and think they're rebelling by not turning them in, but virtually nobody will strike back offensively.

People are too comfortable in their lives to have another revolution. Besides, the only way a revolution could be fought again is through the use of explosives. Those that do use explosives are derided by even 2nd amendment advocates. Revolution requires offensive strikes, not just hiding a gun in your attic insulation “just in case.”

16 posted on 06/15/2010 1:51:09 PM PDT by Dayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

President Obama’s ‘Woodrow Wilson’ moment? (AKA the Treaty of the ‘League of Nations’)?


17 posted on 06/15/2010 1:51:48 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI
Welcome to FR.

I haven't heard of the source you quote. No matter, it would sure be great target practice on blue helmets, U.S. Sen...., etc..

5.56mm

18 posted on 06/15/2010 1:52:27 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

It could pass the Senate.

It could, but we would be looking to replace a lot dead Senators pretty quickly. Don’t know if that qualifies as a revolution as much as a “do over”.


19 posted on 06/15/2010 1:52:36 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Never say never. RINO's aren't real strong on 2A issues.

But yeah... This would cause an Epic sh*t storm as folks like me figure we've got nothing left to lose.

20 posted on 06/15/2010 1:52:42 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson