Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KoRn

That’s a common misconception. My wife specializes in OB/GYN as well. It doesn’t really get unsafe, the risk factors just go up. At no point do they actually become unfavorable. Trisomy 21 is a perfect example. Worst case scenario is 1 in 25 chance of having a child with trisomy 21. Any gambler will tell you that 25:1 is as close to a sure thing as you’ll get. The risk is there, but the odds are heavily in favor of a healthy baby.

It’s all in the parsing of the numbers. Explained as I did above, it doesn’t sound bad. 25:1, not bad odds. Or you could send an expectant mother of advanced maternal age into a panic by telling her that her chances of having a trisomy 21 child are 56 times higher than they were at 21. Which is also true.


52 posted on 05/21/2010 7:23:21 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Melas
Worst case scenario is 1 in 25 chance of having a child with trisomy 21.

I've always wondered: does it make any difference if the child is the first child the woman has had or the tenth?
68 posted on 05/21/2010 8:21:18 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson