Replies

So they say. The notes could just as easily be correlation codes for filing patterns of sightings they’ve verified as legitimate. They’d blackout those codes before public release, so as not to give away the fact that they acknowledge legitimacy. Then to make sure of the coverup, they declare that the blackouts are insults scribbled in the margins by the investigators towards the witnesses.

3 posted on 02/21/2010 6:11:37 AM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)

The notes could just as easily be correlation codes for filing patterns of sightings they’ve verified as legitimate. They’d blackout those codes before public release, so as not to give away the fact that they acknowledge legitimacy. Then to make sure of the coverup, they declare that the blackouts are insults scribbled in the margins by the investigators towards the witnesses.

Absolutely!

I find the idea of "insults" to be a conveniently specious excuse for removing all sorts of information. While I doubt there were actually any "insults"...if there were, they might be valid (however painful/sensitive) comments on the credibility of witnesses.