This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 02/09/2010 11:22:12 AM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 02/08/2010 6:53:20 PM PST by Kryn-Man
You’re entitled to your opinion, no matter how wrong you are. :)
I missed him the day he left the White House.
Carville:
>>”...enacted the largest unfunded entitlement programme in history with the Medicare prescription drug benefit.”
I find it outrageous that some who wish to be considered pluperfect “conservatives,” and wish to tell us all how to think, will use the same faux talking points as a sleazy leftist hack.
Although IMHO Med part D was poorly executed, and did not actually solve the problem; a case can be made for “necessity.”
Consider one case where (prior to part D) a person on SS disability had a total income of $837. His prescriptions were over $900/month. Then the Doctors added more, til the cost would have been over $1,000/month. What would a “libertarian constitutionalist” suggest, in this case?
DG
“We’d be having “
Do you see an obvious problem with this statement?
:)!!
Not me. I sighed in relief and thought, "Well, now we can move onto finding a true, small-government conservative that I don't have to constantly make excuses for." Bush was the GOP version of Jimmy Carter; he will go down in history as one of the worst presidents ever. In 2012, we need to run a solid, SMALL-GOVERNMENT genius that will use the Constitution as a litmus test on every piece of policy brought before his/her desk. No "compassionate conservatism" as Bush proposed from the start, no cut-tax-and-spend growing of government, no RINO's period!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.