Posted on 12/26/2009 7:12:04 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
NASA finally mentions the Maunder Minimum in its discussion of the current prolonged solar minimum, but it STILL does not mention that the Maunder Minimum coincided with the onset of the Little Ice Age, or that the Dalton Minimum in the early 1800’s was also cold, as was the unnamed fin-de-the-1800’s minimum.
Thar she blows, the Maunder Minimum of sunspot activity:
As it has done for two years now, NASA is predicting that solar cycle 24 will ramp up tomorrow. Should that broken-clock prediction hits its hour, then NASA is also predicting that solar cycle 24 will have the modest amplitude of the 1928 cycle, indicated by the red arrow.
A look at the temperature record shows the correspondence between solar activity and temperature:
Maunder Minimum cold; Dalton minimum (just before the red thermometer-based line starts) cold; unnamed end-of-1800’s minimum (first dip in red line) cold; “grand maximum” solar activity between 1920 and 2000 warm.
NASA is acutely aware of this correspondence, but is keeping John Q Public in the dark. Now that the sun has gone quiet again, the climate is cooling again, but you will never hear it from James Hansen’s underlings at NASA:
CO2 keeps going up, but temperatures are going down. NASA frowns and scratches.
Gee you tax-payer supported SOLAR SCIENTISTS, busy gaping at “the quietest sun we’ve seen in almost a century,” if temperature is not being driven by CO2, what possibly COULD have created warming since 1910 and cooling since 2000?
Deluded people all over the world actually think the planet is still warming
This week’s sky-falling headline, courtesy of the UK Times:
Climate change is already killing 300,000 people a year in a “silent crisis” that is seriously affecting hundreds of millions more, an influential humanitarian group warned today. … The report claims that 90 per cent of the deaths are related to gradual environmental degradation caused by a warming climate.
Whatever those supposed deaths might be attributable to, they cannot be attributed to a warming climate, because THE CLIMATE IS NOT WARMING. It is cooling. Just look at any of the major temperature records:
You’d think that the Times could bother to check with England’s own climate office for something as basic as the temperature record, but the problem isn’t JUST the press. Like NASA, the Hadley Centre tries to keep the most basic climate-science facts from the public. When temperatures were rising, Hadley cried the global warming threat from the rooftops. Now that the planet is cooling, they are doing their best to cover it up. Here is Hadley’s current statement:
The year 2008 was tenth warmest on record, exceeded by 1998, 2005, 2003, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2001, 2007 and 1997
They are actually describing a jaggedly descending temperature, but with no mention of the cooling that is occurring. All they say is how warm it still is.
Even those who see themselves as trying to take the reasoned middle ground are misled about the most basic facts. A recent Popular Science editorial claimed that:
…few if any doubt any longer that the warming itself is occurring, given the worldwide rise in surface temperature…
HADcrut3 is a surface temperature record. Can PopSci name a single warming skeptic who is ignorant enough think that this record shows that “warming itself is occurring” when it very clearly shows the opposite?
Presumably they mean to refer to the fact that pretty much everybody now acknowledges that there does seem to have been a small amount of warming between the late 70’s and 2000, topped off by the El Nino spike of 1998. It did indeed take a while for many skeptics to acknowledge this small amount of warming, for the simple reason that it was not evident in satellite readings (as can be seen in the above graphic with the gray background), while the surface temperature records were known to be tainted with an upward temperature bias, thanks to growing “urban heat island” effects.
Pre-98, the alarmists were also not yet sure that temperatures were actually rising. Their theory was that CO2 should cause temperatures to rise, and they were watching like hawks for a clear warming signal that they could take as evidence that this theory was right, but it took them a while to get it. In the mid 90’s, even the most radical alarmists, like NASA’s James Hansen, were only talking about whether or not this predicted signal had been seen yet or not.
They even worked it out so they could claim to see CO2-caused warming in the absence of rising temperatures. Aerosols from coal burning are seen as having a cooling effect, so in the absence of CO2 warming effects, cooling would be expected. Thus so long as temperature readings were not actually showing global cooling, Hansen et. al. could claim that human release of CO2 was having a measurable warming effect. (See for instance, the 1995 IPCC report, summary of the science, p. 22, subhead 4: “The balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate.)
With the El Nino spike, it became clear that some warming had occurred. But that was the temperature peak. Since then the surface records and the satellite records all show cooling. Thus the alarmists got essentially one data point that can be taken as supportive of their theory: the very late 90’s did show a clear warming signal. Unfortunately for them, the CO2 theory has no explanation for the rest of the temperature record.
There was no significant human production of CO2 before WWII, so the CO2 theory has no explanation for planetary warming from the Little Ice Age to the 1930s (covering about .8° of the 1°C temperature rise between the Little Ice Age and today). In contrast, the theory that solar-magnetic activity drives climate fits this emergence from Little Ice Age very well: goodbye Maunder Minimum, with hiccups at the Dalton Minimum and the fin-de-1800’s minimum.
Ditto for the post-2000 cooling: it does not fit the CO2 theory at all, but fits perfectly with the theory that climate is driven by solar activity.
Notice some of the sources....thought they had lost some data...hmmm...
Thanks,...you seem to catch everything...was going to ping you .
ping
Why are you trying to confuse people with facts and logic, this is a Moral issue remember.
Researcher: NASA hiding climate data
The Washington Times ^ | December 3, 2009 | Stephen Dinan
Posted on Thu 03 Dec 2009 10:43:23 AM PST by george76
****************************
NASA sunspot activity prediction indicates next decade coldest in over a century [FR Exclusive]
Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA ^ | December 13, 2009 | nwrep
Then we have two more high peaks (Global Warming), followed by a lower peak (remember the phrase "hide the decline" from the leaked emails?).
Right now we are in an extended period of low solar activity. Of course, that has nothing to do with the unusual cold and heavy snowfall...
Notice the source on that bottom graph.....didn’t they claim they had lost data?
Thanks for the great post.
All it takes is for one State to hold public trials for FRAUD against all these AGW salesman. considering Taxpayer monies have been used to perpetrate this fraud, Any State has the right to bring legal action. Considering none of these people have EVER been sworn under oath with regards to AGW, Shouldn’t the States give them the opportunity to make their case UNDER OATH and in PUBLIC. Now if they truly have lost the original data the case won’t even make it passed discovery. They will have been shown to the public to be FRAUDS. You cannot testify about evidence that doesn’t exist.
Out for most of the day,...overnight to my daughters place ...High Desert locale.
The visible disk is Spotless unlike NASAs record of lies and deception.
The Sun Today:
Analysis of Solar Active Regions and Activity from 24/2100Z to 25/2100Z: Solar activity was very low. No flares were observed. The visible disk was spotless.
Solar Activity Forecast: Solar activity is expected to be very low.
Geophysical Activity Summary 24/2100Z to 25/2100Z: The geomagnetic field was quiet. Solar wind observations from the ACE satellite decreased gradually after 24/2235Z, from 380 km/s to 282 km/s at 25/1457Z. Velocities then increased to 354 km/s at 25/1708Z as the density increased to a peak of 13 p/cc. The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) increased, with the total field reaching +10 nT at 25/1852Z. The southward component of the IMF ranged between -8 nT and +7 nT, with the peak of -8 nT at 25/1609Z. This activity is consistent with the arrival of the partial halo coronal mass ejection (CME) observed on 22 December.
Geophysical Activity Forecast: The geomagnetic field is expected to be predominantly quiet, with isolated unsettled periods possible at high latitudes, on day one (26 December). Quiet levels are expected on days two and three (27-28 December).
I went around last weekend telling every liberal friend or neighbor or coworker I could get my hands on, “Ha-ha, I just had to shovel 24 inches of global warming off of my driveway, how much did you get?” Phrased that way, it was hard for them to argue with my point.
A gubamint agency hiding or playing fast and loose with facts.
I’m shocked.
That it is Nasa.. makes it all the worse.
So that explains our present situation where a mild normal El Nino event occurs along with dramatic cooling in the US and higher then normal winter time snow fall levels. When that sunlight warmed Pacific ocean water is not being cooled and moved westward to Australia and Indonesia, the Eastern Pacific experiences higher then normal precipitation levels. This is due to the warm water evaporating and the energetic atmosphere moving back to the east. So what does this mean to the average American ? Buy a back up snow shovel cause we will be breaking snow fall records all winter. Please note that a strong El Nino could transfer a significant amount of that evaporative heat energy to the US during winter time, but our current El Nino is mild and the waters off the California coast are normal to slightly cool.
Summation
The reason the US is cold this winter is due to a prolonged Solar Minimum.
The reason the US is breaking snow fall records this winter is due to the mild El Nino and the Solar Minimum (less cosmic rays and more atmospheric water formation).
Global Warming on Free Republic
Rich countries must provide free abortions to these countries/sarc
Oh the loony theories of the left
Correction - less cosmic rays, should read, more cosmic rays.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
