The entire democrat party is full of John Edwards, enabled by an absolutely corrupt State Media.
Posted on 09/20/2009 9:54:01 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
No, it's not a storyline on "Guiding Light" (RIP) -- but rather the latest chapter in the John Edwards mistress scandal.
The guy who once claimed he was the father of the child born to Edwards' mistress, Rielle Hunter, is now claiming Edwards is the real daddy (duh!) and that Edwards once promised Hunter he would marry her after his wife died (she's sick with cancer) -- this according to a book proposal obtained by the NY Times.
Andrew Young, Edwards' former aide, claims Edwards told Hunter it would be a rooftop wedding and the Dave Matthews Band would make an appearance, the Times says.
Because it's the dream of every major recording artist to play at the wedding of a disgraced politician to the mistress they had a child out of wedlock with after the politician's first wife dies of cancer.
(Excerpt) Read more at tmz.com ...
LOL
Edwards is marrying Dave Matthews ?
Or is it staged for the victimhood vote ?Is Edwards wife really sick ?
Priceless.
The entire democrat party is full of John Edwards, enabled by an absolutely corrupt State Media.
“Hey, guys! Let’s go out for drinks and a sandwich! Come on, what do you say?”
Pray for the child.
Consider the gene pool.
Dad: Scum bag tort lawyer turned scum bag politician.
Mom: New age whackjob celeb stalker
Dave Matthews is enough of an assh*le, that he would indeed sing at the Elizabeth Edwards graveside wedding between the promiscuous whore... and Rielle Hunter.
Matthews cast his support strongly with Democratic nominee John F. Kerry, performing at political events including the Vote for Change tour. Matthews also supported Barack Obama for President in 2008, both in the primaries and in the general election.
The truly sad part is the fact that Edwards couldn’t, in his wildest dreams, have screwed up our Country worse than the clown we now have.
He almost did win - the MSM sure was doing what they could to hide the story - they only came forward when the National Inquirer came forward with a picture.
Guess it took Hillary's people some time to get the pic to the right people. Here's what we know - the MSM works for Dems - but NOT all dems equally.
You’re absolutely correct.
Edwards is just typical Kennedyesque liberal scum.
Baraq is a Marxist to the core.
Tort reform poster girl.
Leni
Dave Matthews got sued for crap and now he’s going to play for crap.
Man, and I thought Bill & Hill were white trash.
> “Edwards is marrying Dave Matthews?”
No. Chris Matthews.
But Chris said that it was Obama that sent a thrill up his leg.
According to people familiar with the grand jury investigation, prosecutors are considering a complicated and novel legal issue: whether payments to a candidate’s mistress to ensure her silence (and thus maintain the candidate’s viability) should be considered campaign donations and thus whether they should be reported. When Mr. Edwards was running for president, and later when he still held out hope of a cabinet position in the Obama administration, two of his wealthy patrons, through a once-trusted Edwards aide, quietly provided Ms. Hunter with large financial benefits, including a new BMW and lodging, that were used to keep her out of public view.
Mr. Young, who has since renounced that statement, has told publishers in a book proposal that Mr. Edwards knew all along that he was the child’s father. He said Mr. Edwards pleaded with him to accept responsibility falsely, saying that would reduce the story to one of an aide’s infidelity.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/us/politics/20edwards.html?hp
At one point, Mr. Young wrote, Mr. Edwards asked Mr. Baron if he could find a doctor who would falsify a DNA report.
Who paid the gift taxes on all this crap? The skirting (and possible breaking) of the campaign laws may or may not bear fruit for the prosecution, but it seems like a simple and straight forward prosecution based on a scheme to avoid income taxes might just be the easiest cat to skin here - unless of course this is all just for show and they don't have any intentions of skinning any cats, much less any sleazy, low-life philandering ambulance chasers.
The laws only apply to the ‘little people’. I wouldn’t suggest any of us try that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.